Siddarth - Editing Advice

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Will rework the contrast, but wanted to check if the composition was not acceptable - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7806877. I had offset the foreground aicraft so as to be able to capture the 'more interesting' livery in background.

Thanks and regards,
Siddarth

Don't think the trees add that much. The dreamliner livery can be kept in the frame even if you cut more off the top.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Will rework the contrast, but wanted to check if the composition was not acceptable - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7806877. I had offset the foreground aicraft so as to be able to capture the 'more interesting' livery in background.

Thanks and regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Can i please get pre-screening advice for these pics.




Regards,
Siddarth

Both borderline for (weak) contrast; first also has light halos and dust visible.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Can i please get pre-screening advice for these pics.




Regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Happy Monday! Can i please get some help on fixing this second time reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7746610. I can reprocess and further reduce the sharpening, but what must be the reference to level the shot?

Regards,
Siddarth

Verticals are mostly leaning left.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Happy Monday! Can i please get some help on fixing this second time reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7746610. I can reprocess and further reduce the sharpening, but what must be the reference to level the shot?

Regards,
Siddarth

[Julian S.]

Hi,

I had this reject for backlit - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7709815. I am sure the sun was behind at that time of the day and you can see from little bit of the tail that is peeping out that it is well illuminated. I felt that rejection was a bit harsh for an under-belly shot.

Thanks and regards,
Siddarth

Hi!

Biggest Part of the Aircraft is in its own shadow what is the reason for the "backlit".

Regards.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

I had this reject for backlit - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7709815. I am sure the sun was behind at that time of the day and you can see from little bit of the tail that is peeping out that it is well illuminated. I felt that rejection was a bit harsh for an under-belly shot.

Thanks and regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Warm greetings! Getting back to uploading after a break. Need help with this rejection for horizon - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7554803. I had used verticals of the hangar/lamp posts near the second Dreamlifter as reference.

Thanks and regards,
Siddarth

Honestly, I don't see anything definitive that would tell me the horizon is really off. The vertical references are conflicting, so would have been ok for me, but... the contrast and (over)sharpening probably should have been rejection reasons as well (instead). Try giving it a touch of CW rotation, and maybe tone down the sharpening a bit if you decide to try again.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Warm greetings! Getting back to uploading after a break. Need help with this rejection for horizon - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7554803. I had used verticals of the hangar/lamp posts near the second Dreamlifter as reference.

Thanks and regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,


Wish you all a very happy new year. Got back to processing and uploading after a break. Can I please get some help with these rejects:

1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7034862 - received few rejects of similar kind. Is the 'over-exposed' rejection because of the light in window/roof panes? I felt the aircraft itself was well exposed. Any suggestions on how to fix the over-exposure coming only from the window panes

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7036772 - I will rework the sharpening and exposure, but did not understand the motive rejection. The Marine standing is a statue.

Regards,
Siddarth

1. Exterior window is blown out. Probably not fixable.
2. Screener probably didn't realize it was part of the display. You can ignore the motive rejection.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,


Wish you all a very happy new year. Got back to processing and uploading after a break. Can I please get some help with these rejects:

1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7034862 - received few rejects of similar kind. Is the 'over-exposed' rejection because of the light in window/roof panes? I felt the aircraft itself was well exposed. Any suggestions on how to fix the over-exposure coming only from the window panes

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7036772 - I will rework the sharpening and exposure, but did not understand the motive rejection. The Marine standing is a statue.

Regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Can I please get some help on fixing this pic - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6610485.

Regards,
Siddarth

Contrast is too low, darks are all washed out.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Can I please get some help on fixing this pic - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6610485.

Regards,
Siddarth

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Possibly. The blacks look quite washed out, so you might want to fix that.

Thanks Dana. Will try to fix that and re-upload.

Have a nice day.
Regards,
Siddarth