Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Siddarth - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Hi,

    Merry Christmas and Season greetings!

    Can you i please get some feedback if this pic is suitable for JP upload? I had to manually adjust the WB since it was shot through glass and there was no clear white point to select.

    Regards,
    Sid
    Likely to be rejected for contrast and oversharpened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Hi,

    Merry Christmas and Season greetings!

    Can you i please get some feedback if this pic is suitable for JP upload? I had to manually adjust the WB since it was shot through glass and there was no clear white point to select.

    Regards,
    Sid
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    No need to appeal, I've accepted the image.
    Thank you so much!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    Doesn't really look like a real aircraft, does it?
    Going to have to correct you there Geri, we do accept such simulators:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/aircraft/Link+Trainer

    I've spoken to the screeners involved and they were also unaware that we did accept such images, but have now been informed.

    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Hi,

    Can you please help me understand the motive rejection - Aviation photos - 4 million+ on JetPhotos?
    No need to appeal, I've accepted the image.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Hi,

    Can you please help me understand the motive rejection - Aviation photos - 4 million+ on JetPhotos?

    Regards,
    Siddarth
    Doesn't really look like a real aircraft, does it?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Hi,

    Can you please help me understand the motive rejection - Aviation photos - 4 million+ on JetPhotos?

    Regards,
    Siddarth
    I don't see anything obvious, but I will ask the screeners involved to see if they can explain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Hi,

    Can you please help me understand the motive rejection - Aviation photos - 4 million+ on JetPhotos?

    Regards,
    Siddarth

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Thank you Gerardo and Dana for the feedback. I just don't seem to have an eye to catch this I was looking at the engines - the part closest to ground. But going forward will use the zoom technique for shots taken in this location and time of day.

    Thanks and regards,
    Siddarth

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post

    Thanks so much Dana for helping as always. The first pic is a crop of the nose section from original pic with no post processing or re-size. Second is the pic uploaded and rejected (for reference since link has expired)

    Regards.
    Siddarth
    Oooh boy, that's quite A LOT of heat haze.. so rejection was correct after all

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post

    Thanks so much Dana for helping as always. The first pic is a crop of the nose section from original pic with no post processing or re-size. Second is the pic uploaded and rejected (for reference since link has expired)

    Regards.
    Siddarth
    Looks indeed like heat distortion on the aircraft itself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Something is happening with the US Air Force titles near the nose and the roundel near the tail. If not heat haze, then something else? Can you post a 100% crop of one of those areas? I could tell you perhaps what the issue might be.
    Thanks so much Dana for helping as always. The first pic is a crop of the nose section from original pic with no post processing or re-size. Second is the pic uploaded and rejected (for reference since link has expired)

    Regards.
    Siddarth
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Siddarth.Bhandary; 2020-12-05, 16:04.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Can i get some help understanding the heat distortion rejection in Aviation photos - 4 million+ on JetPhotos, so as to avoid similar uploads in the future. The far background is heat distorted but the runway the plane is taxing on was not. I used the under belly line and NLG as reference.

    Regards,
    Siddarth
    Something is happening with the US Air Force titles near the nose and the roundel near the tail. If not heat haze, then something else? Can you post a 100% crop of one of those areas? I could tell you perhaps what the issue might be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Can i get some help understanding the heat distortion rejection in Aviation photos - 4 million+ on JetPhotos, so as to avoid similar uploads in the future. The far background is heat distorted but the runway the plane is taxing on was not. I used the under belly line and NLG as reference.

    Regards,
    Siddarth

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
    Can i please get some suggestion to fix this reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8452178

    The sun is gleaming on the fuselage, so any increase in exposure risks washing out parts of the fuselage.

    Thanks and regards,
    Siddarth
    Choose a different angle without the glare, and then brighten. If not possible, then still brighten, and hope the glare doesn't become washed out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Siddarth.Bhandary
    replied
    Can i please get some suggestion to fix this reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8452178

    The sun is gleaming on the fuselage, so any increase in exposure risks washing out parts of the fuselage.

    Thanks and regards,
    Siddarth

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X