MarkLawrence - Editing Advice

[MarkLawrence]

AARRRGGGGHHHHHHHH.. 15 rejections .. because the location bug that changed the location from what I submitted to the first location in the Florida drop down .. sorry .. very frustrated especially after correcting them all at one point and 15 days in the queue.

[dlowwa]

Wow.. thanks Dana .. I haven't submitted military in ages compared to commercial .. I'll make sure ..

Sometimes the system (upload page) defaults to military without you changing it. I've caught it a couple of times on my own uploads.

[MarkLawrence]

Rejected image: background verticals are all leaning a bit right, and they're usually more reliable. It was selected as Military. The accepted images were also selected as such, but were fixed for you.

Wow.. thanks Dana .. I haven't submitted military in ages compared to commercial .. I'll make sure ..

[dlowwa]

Rejected image: background verticals are all leaning a bit right, and they're usually more reliable. It was selected as Military. The accepted images were also selected as such, but were fixed for you.

Prescreening: Looks somewhat blurry towards the edges, and crop is borderline.

[MarkLawrence]

Could I also please get a pre-screen on this.

Thanks!

[MarkLawrence]

Can I ask about this rejection? I checked the vertical with the vertical of the jet bridge and it seems to be in alignment. Also, the horizontals of the taxiway signs appears to be fine too. Also, what is the Genre rejection? The rejections I had this morning all said Genre, yet there were 17 acceptances from the same set loaded with the same genre.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10781599

[MarkLawrence]

Okay .. thanks Dana .. will look for another in the series .. or . try a lower resolution..

[dlowwa]

Could I get pre-screening on this - I am concerned with sharpness specifically with attempting at the size of 1900 that I am trying.

Indeed an issue, and actually more blurry than soft (and oversharpened to compensate it seems).

[MarkLawrence]

Could I get pre-screening on this - I am concerned with sharpness specifically with attempting at the size of 1900 that I am trying.

[MarkLawrence]

Thanks Alex - I will re-edit using that!

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Verticals are all slightly leaning to left, I recommend a 0.3 CW rotation.

regards
Alex

[MarkLawrence]

My apologies - forgot the link https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10659744

[dlowwa]

Could I ask a screeners opinion on this horizon rejection. I used the vertical on the building on the left which I outlined, and that appears okay to me, but there are so many verticals and horizontals on this, I would like to make sure that is the correct place. I see a few other verticals that seem to be fine, but which one would be the correct one to use as I have another from the same location that was also rejected for horizon and I want to correct both.

Can't give an opinion without seeing the image that was actually rejected.

[MarkLawrence]

Could I ask a screeners opinion on this horizon rejection. I used the vertical on the building on the left which I outlined, and that appears okay to me, but there are so many verticals and horizontals on this, I would like to make sure that is the correct place. I see a few other verticals that seem to be fine, but which one would be the correct one to use as I have another from the same location that was also rejected for horizon and I want to correct both.

[dlowwa]

I have a question about this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10571614 - it was first rejected for horizon, which I corrected, but now it shows as heat hazed. I am struggling to see the heat haze - can a screener help me please?

Not really an issue for me..