If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Interestingly enough Dana, I submitted again with the Small Prop - it got rejected this time for noise/grain - AND - incorrect categories - soooooooo - if I do manage to edit a frame without the noise - I still doesn't know which one will be correct!!!!
Well... there is some noise visible, but obviously would have been acceptable for me, especially as a new reg. Category rejection was a mistake, so if you were to appeal, I know I would accept it.
Interestingly enough Dana, I submitted again with the Small Prop - it got rejected this time for noise/grain - AND - incorrect categories - soooooooo - if I do manage to edit a frame without the noise - I still doesn't know which one will be correct!!!!
Okay - thanks Dana - I guess I will submit a request for a new airline as it does not show up in the list at the moment. Any idea on the category thing?
10 seats or fewer in the cabin? If so, then yes Small Prop.
Okay - thanks Dana - I guess I will submit a request for a new airline as it does not show up in the list at the moment. Any idea on the category thing?
The owner is a private LLC - I selected Other | Private - and - it was rejected for bad info:airline - is this wrong?
Also, I don't think I selected small prop, and I'm not sure if this is classed as a small prop? I've never selected small prop for a KingAir? - but - maybe I did and that is what was wrong.
Owner listed as Zulu Air by FAA, and doesn't appear to be a private operator:
The owner is a private LLC - I selected Other | Private - and - it was rejected for bad info:airline - is this wrong?
Also, I don't think I selected small prop, and I'm not sure if this is classed as a small prop? I've never selected small prop for a KingAir? - but - maybe I did and that is what was wrong.
I have a question regarding this reject if a screener can help me out. I had this one accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9617313 and I had deliberately cropped that tight because I liked the crop of it. The one that was accepted shows to me the same sort of symmetry as the one that was rejected - so - I'm wondering what part of the plane is cut off - is it the tail that it is being rejected for? Because my accepted one also has part of the tail cut off - was just wondering about them. Advice on the rejection please?
If you're going to crop the tail as you did in the rejected one, better to crop a lot tighter than you did. If not, better to leave the whole tail in. It's ok in the accepted image because you at least cropped tightly to the horizontal stab.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I have a question regarding this reject if a screener can help me out. I had this one accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9617313 and I had deliberately cropped that tight because I liked the crop of it. The one that was accepted shows to me the same sort of symmetry as the one that was rejected - so - I'm wondering what part of the plane is cut off - is it the tail that it is being rejected for? Because my accepted one also has part of the tail cut off - was just wondering about them. Advice on the rejection please?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: