Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

theaviationspotter - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    I personally prefer the colours in the upper photo, but the photo is too dark.

    Easiest way to correct colour is in the RAW converter, where you can set the white point and colour temperature.
    Surely; if the JP requirements were not the subject of course, surely I would prefer the natural source of light to edit it.

    1. The above photo is not edited. It's normal to be dark.
    2. The following image is an edited version. However it has a completely unrealistic light.

    Result: I've been uploaded in one of the (original) photo colors, and I was rejected because of the ''color'' of the photo. I'm just trying to fix myself and find a correct spot to edit/upload over here.

    Btw, thank you very much for commenting on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21563[/ATTACH]
    Original Photo

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21564[/ATTACH]
    Edited.

    Well, currently seems that I have small problem with light. There are 65-70 different air asia planes in the WMKK airport apron, but there is a problem here. Because of the disgusting lights of the airport, almost all of them are yellow. I tried to edit one experimental shot above. Are there any problems if you only look at the color?

    Question 2: Do you have a suggestion for this color corrections on the Raw Screen or normal PS interface?

    Thanks in advance.
    I personally prefer the colours in the upper photo, but the photo is too dark.

    Easiest way to correct colour is in the RAW converter, where you can set the white point and colour temperature.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20180609_020734.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	972.1 KB
ID:	1032738
    Original Photo

    Click image for larger version

Name:	try.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	731.7 KB
ID:	1032739
    Edited.

    Well, currently seems that I have small problem with light. There are 65-70 different air asia planes in the WMKK airport apron, but there is a problem here. Because of the disgusting lights of the airport, almost all of them are yellow. I tried to edit one experimental shot above. Are there any problems if you only look at the color?

    Question 2: Do you have a suggestion for this color corrections on the Raw Screen or normal PS interface?

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21041[/ATTACH]

    Hi again, is that shot considered as backlit ?
    It is borderline backlit. The aircraft has a harsh contrast, the tail is in its own shadow, the background is washed out. As mentioned, it is borderline. you can try it if you want.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RMI.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	687.4 KB
ID:	1032302

    Hi again, is that shot considered as backlit ?

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20214[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20215[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20216[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20217[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20218[/ATTACH]

    A simple comment would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
    1: Harsh contrast, soft
    2: Needs a bit of CCW rotation
    3, 4: soft
    5: OK

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	4R-ALQ_11_04_2018_WMKK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	324.1 KB
ID:	1031636

    Click image for larger version

Name:	9K-CAJ_27_11_2017_OJAI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	617.4 KB
ID:	1031637

    Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-BBO_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	706.7 KB
ID:	1031638

    Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-CBA_27_07_2018_VTDB.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	704.2 KB
ID:	1031639

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OD-MRL_16_12_2017_OJAI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	734.4 KB
ID:	1031640

    A simple comment would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    I would like to ask a few question instead of screening a photo;

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19861[/ATTACH]

    Question A. For the red security strip in the photo, can we say obstructin object? The reason I'm asking may be so, but it's technically impossible to take that strip and I can't take pictures of it any higher.
    Question B. Assuming that I have uploaded the above photo securely, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8762908; with the photo in the link I've mentioned is considered as similar?

    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]19862[/ATTACH]

    I can edit the photo, but is the photo considered as a backlit?

    Thanks in advance.
    1. Not obstruction
    2. Yes similar
    3. Not quite backlit, but quality is terrible, so doubt any edit will be workable

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    I would like to ask a few question instead of screening a photo;

    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	20171027_152628.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1031368

    Question A. For the red security strip in the photo, can we say obstructin object? The reason I'm asking may be so, but it's technically impossible to take that strip and I can't take pictures of it any higher.
    Question B. Assuming that I have uploaded the above photo securely, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8762908; with the photo in the link I've mentioned is considered as similar?

    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5761.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	714.8 KB
ID:	1031369

    I can edit the photo, but is the photo considered as a backlit?

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19163[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19164[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19165[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19166[/ATTACH]

    A quick review would be appreciated.
    1. borderline soft/dark
    2. contrast, clutter
    3-4 dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9A-CTH_21_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	317.2 KB
ID:	1030767

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B-2481_23_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	511.5 KB
ID:	1030768

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B-18001_21_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	321.8 KB
ID:	1030769

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ALFC_21_04_2018_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	286.7 KB
ID:	1030770

    A quick review would be appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19131[/ATTACH]

    A quick review would be appreciated.
    Likely a contrast rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LWA_03_07_2017_EDDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	480.5 KB
ID:	1030740

    A quick review would be appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18798[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18799[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18800[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18801[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18802[/ATTACH]

    Another branch of controversial photos for me.
    A quick review would be appreciated.

    P.S: Thanks to everyone who helps me in that thread however special thanks dlowwa, for taking time and always trying to help me
    1. soft, centering
    2. borderline soft, dark/contrast
    3. borderline heat haze
    4. horizon, borderline heat haze
    5. soft

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-AFB_20_01_2016_LTBA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.2 KB
ID:	1030467

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENB_04_08_2018_LTBA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	302.6 KB
ID:	1030468

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ATUZ_06_07_2017_EDDL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	661.4 KB
ID:	1030469

    Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-BIT_06_07_2017_EDDL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	610.3 KB
ID:	1030470

    Click image for larger version

Name:	YV3016_03_08_2018_LTBA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	694.3 KB
ID:	1030471

    Another branch of controversial photos for me.
    A quick review would be appreciated.

    P.S: Thanks to everyone who helps me in that thread however special thanks dlowwa, for taking time and always trying to help me

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X