Originally posted by theaviationspotter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
theaviationspotter - Editing advice
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View PostThis one we could probably make an exception as we don't have that scheme in the database
Regards
Alex
Have a nice day.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by theaviationspotter View PostThank you very much Alex. Logical point of view, thank you very much. This is what I want so far.
In addition to that;
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12185[/ATTACH]
can we also share same feeling for that one? Since, that one is hot one.
btw, kindly do not take me wrong; I am just asking to learn/understand better for that clutter/obstructing thing more deeply. As you can see that; I am not a big fan of fantastic photos so far, however I just want to try my chance.
Thanks you very much for kindly response.
Regards
AlexLast edited by Alex - Spot-This !; 2017-12-20, 16:02.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View PostAs we do have a good, non obstructed shot of that plane we have no reasons to accept the cluttered one sorry.
In addition to that;
can we also share same feeling for that one? Since, that one is hot one.
btw, kindly do not take me wrong; I am just asking to learn/understand better for that clutter/obstructing thing more deeply. As you can see that; I am not a big fan of fantastic photos so far, however I just want to try my chance.
Thanks you very much for kindly response.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]12181[/ATTACH]
Hi.
As far as I known; that photo needs to be rejected as Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter.
However these objects are unavoidable according to my point of view. There is even zero chance to take those photos without any obstructing objects.
Actually my question: is there any chance to be accepted or not. A little more explanation is enough for me because I believe that, aircraft itself is a very rare one.
Thanks in advance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]12181[/ATTACH]
Hi.
As far as I known; that photo needs to be rejected as Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter.
However these objects are unavoidable according to my point of view. There is even zero chance to take those photos without any obstructing objects.
Actually my question: is there any chance to be accepted or not. A little more explanation is enough for me because I believe that, aircraft itself is a very rare one.
Thanks in advance.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi.
As far as I known; that photo needs to be rejected as Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter.
However these objects are unavoidable according to my point of view. There is even zero chance to take those photos without any obstructing objects.
Actually my question: is there any chance to be accepted or not. A little more explanation is enough for me because I believe that, aircraft itself is a very rare one.
Thanks in advance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by theaviationspotter View PostHi
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12068[/ATTACH]
Personally I am not a big fan of that kind of shot, however, I want to take my chance...
Is it acceptable?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]11409[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11410[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11411[/ATTACH]
Another 3 experimental shot. Please pre-screen these photos
Thanks in advance
2. heat haze, contrast, soft
3. heat haze, contrast, overhsarpened
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View PostLooks acceptable here.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: