Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

theaviationspotter - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    I wanted to send it all in one post, instead of sending one-by-one and creating chaos.
    I am going to continue with OJAI Airport.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12211[/ATTACH]


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12212[/ATTACH]

    A40-DG


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12213[/ATTACH]
    A40-DG economy config.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12214[/ATTACH]

    I know, I have to prefer one or just thrown away both of A40-DG's photos.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12215[/ATTACH]
    5N-BLC
    Since I am mobile not an opinion on the shots quality wise. But just a heads up that Oman is A4O and not A40.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    I wanted to send it all in one post, instead of sending one-by-one and creating chaos.
    I am going to continue with OJAI Airport.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	16_12_2017_OJAI_A7-ALL2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	584.0 KB
ID:	1021052


    Click image for larger version

Name:	A40-DG-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	586.2 KB
ID:	1021053

    A40-DG


    Click image for larger version

Name:	A4O-DG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	700.7 KB
ID:	1021054
    A40-DG economy config.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6475.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	644.4 KB
ID:	1021055

    I know, I have to prefer one or just thrown away both of A40-DG's photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	16_12_2017_OJAI_5N-BLC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	591.9 KB
ID:	1021056
    5N-BLC

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    This one we could probably make an exception as we don't have that scheme in the database

    Regards
    Alex
    Thank you very much, appreciated.

    Have a nice day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    Thank you very much Alex. Logical point of view, thank you very much. This is what I want so far.

    In addition to that;

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12185[/ATTACH]

    can we also share same feeling for that one? Since, that one is hot one.

    btw, kindly do not take me wrong; I am just asking to learn/understand better for that clutter/obstructing thing more deeply. As you can see that; I am not a big fan of fantastic photos so far, however I just want to try my chance.

    Thanks you very much for kindly response.
    This one we could probably make an exception as we don't have that reg or scheme in the database and it's also a very rare catch.

    Regards
    Alex
    Last edited by Alex - Spot-This !; 2017-12-20, 16:02.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    As we do have a good, non obstructed shot of that plane we have no reasons to accept the cluttered one sorry.
    Thank you very much Alex. Logical point of view, thank you very much. This is what I want so far.

    In addition to that;

    Click image for larger version

Name:	16_12_2017_OJAI_EK-73772.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	701.7 KB
ID:	1021026

    can we also share same feeling for that one? Since, that one is hot one.

    btw, kindly do not take me wrong; I am just asking to learn/understand better for that clutter/obstructing thing more deeply. As you can see that; I am not a big fan of fantastic photos so far, however I just want to try my chance.

    Thanks you very much for kindly response.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12181[/ATTACH]


    Hi.

    As far as I known; that photo needs to be rejected as Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter.
    However these objects are unavoidable according to my point of view. There is even zero chance to take those photos without any obstructing objects.
    Actually my question: is there any chance to be accepted or not. A little more explanation is enough for me because I believe that, aircraft itself is a very rare one.

    Thanks in advance.
    As we do have a good, non obstructed shot of that plane we have no reasons to accept the cluttered one sorry.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12181[/ATTACH]


    Hi.

    As far as I known; that photo needs to be rejected as Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter.
    However these objects are unavoidable according to my point of view. There is even zero chance to take those photos without any obstructing objects.
    Actually my question: is there any chance to be accepted or not. A little more explanation is enough for me because I believe that, aircraft itself is a very rare one.

    Thanks in advance.
    In my opinion the clutter is too distracting, but you can always try it.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	16_12_2017_OJAI_JY-JRG.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	678.4 KB
ID:	1021022


    Hi.

    As far as I known; that photo needs to be rejected as Obstructing Objects / Foreground Clutter.
    However these objects are unavoidable according to my point of view. There is even zero chance to take those photos without any obstructing objects.
    Actually my question: is there any chance to be accepted or not. A little more explanation is enough for me because I believe that, aircraft itself is a very rare one.

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • B7772ADL
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    Hi

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12068[/ATTACH]

    Personally I am not a big fan of that kind of shot, however, I want to take my chance...
    Is it acceptable?
    I quite like it...whether it would be accepted is another issue. Possibly a bit more contrast and sharpening.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Hi

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A4O-DGI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	353.0 KB
ID:	1020913

    Personally I am not a big fan of that kind of shot, however, I want to take my chance...
    Is it acceptable?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11409[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11410[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11411[/ATTACH]

    Another 3 experimental shot. Please pre-screen these photos

    Thanks in advance
    1. contrast, soft
    2. heat haze, contrast, soft
    3. heat haze, contrast, overhsarpened

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGT.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	652.8 KB
ID:	1020317

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EP-ZGB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	416.1 KB
ID:	1020318

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LJK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	830.9 KB
ID:	1020319

    Another 3 experimental shot. Please pre-screen these photos

    Thanks in advance
    Last edited by theaviationspotter; 2017-11-18, 17:45. Reason: adding another photo

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    Looks acceptable here.
    Thank you very much. I think it deserves to be in queue

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by theaviationspotter View Post
    L-1011 N300AW

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11365[/ATTACH]

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photo!

    Thanks in advance.
    Looks acceptable here.

    Leave a comment:


  • theaviationspotter
    replied
    L-1011 N300AW

    Click image for larger version

Name:	tristar.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	516.6 KB
ID:	1020282

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photo!

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X