Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Matt737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25744[/ATTACH]

    Would this be accepted?
    Possibly. I would be a bit concerned about oversharpening maybe hiding a bit of blur, but might be acceptable as is.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Turkish Airlines 777-300ER TC-JJU JetPhotos.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	829.8 KB
ID:	1040308

    Would this be accepted?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25557[/ATTACH]

    Could someone take a look at this please? Wasn't too sure about the brightness and sharpening. Thanks.
    Exposure should be ok, but maybe a touch too soft for 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	USAF VC-25 29000 (Air Force One) JetPhotos.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	813.5 KB
ID:	1040148

    Could someone take a look at this please? Wasn't too sure about the brightness and sharpening. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25464[/ATTACH]

    Would this be accepted?
    Likely would be rejected for heat haze.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Emirates 777-300ER A6-EQC JetPhotos.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.43 MB
ID:	1040081

    Would this be accepted?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    I've recently been getting rejected for either soft or or overprocessed. How can I know, on my own, that an image is too soft, or too sharp/overprocessed?
    Softness you're just going to have to rely on your eyes; overprocessing usually manifests itself in the form of halos (brighter areas) around objects in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    I've recently been getting rejected for either soft or or overprocessed. How can I know, on my own, that an image is too soft, or too sharp/overprocessed?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21946[/ATTACH]

    Is this acceptable?
    Would be rejected for soft, centering, overprocessed, dirty, and perhaps contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Delta 737-800 N381DN (SkyTeam) JetPhotos.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	537.5 KB
ID:	1033052

    Is this acceptable?

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    These are not considered similar

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    So I already have a picture of G-ZBKD in the database. I was wondering if this shot would be allowed because it is a different angle from the first, and it is a different stage of flight.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	British Airways 787-9 G-ZBKD JetPhotos (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1032698

    The first picture is https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9204414.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21103[/ATTACH]

    Alright, sorry about that...hopefully this is the final version!
    This image is quite soft. I suspect the original is quite soft, and the oversharpening was an attempt to cover it up. In any case, it certainly appears the quality is not there to submit at 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt737
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Qatar 777-200LR A7-BBC (2) JetPhotos.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	634.1 KB
ID:	1032359

    Alright, sorry about that...hopefully this is the final version!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by matt737 View Post
    Does that mean if I don't sharpen it as much, it will be acceptable, or will the compression still be an issue?
    Can only answer a hypothetical with another hypothetical. Maybe. Maybe not. Can only say after seeing the result.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X