Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pkautzsch - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pkautzsch View Post
    Digging out a few older shots for re-editing. Some of them have, in earlier edit versions, been rejected previously, now I'm re-editing with better skills.
    So, how about those:

    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EP-MMC_Mahan343_3955.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	603.1 KB
ID:	1079729

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EP-MMF_Mahan_S70-300_4731.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	442.5 KB
ID:	1079730

    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JA871A_ANA_7332.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	529.6 KB
ID:	1079731

    4.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-82047_VolgaDnepr_AN124_S70-300_9198.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	454.1 KB
ID:	1079732

    5.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-BHX_Yamal_T_8006.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	450.8 KB
ID:	1079733

    Thank you
    1. obstruction
    2. borderline vignetting
    3. oversharpened, contrast
    4. horizon (CW)
    5. borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Digging out a few older shots for re-editing. Some of them have, in earlier edit versions, been rejected previously, now I'm re-editing with better skills.
    So, how about those:

    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EP-MMC_Mahan343_3955.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	603.1 KB
ID:	1079729

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EP-MMF_Mahan_S70-300_4731.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	442.5 KB
ID:	1079730

    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JA871A_ANA_7332.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	529.6 KB
ID:	1079731

    4.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-82047_VolgaDnepr_AN124_S70-300_9198.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	454.1 KB
ID:	1079732

    5.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-BHX_Yamal_T_8006.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	450.8 KB
ID:	1079733

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pkautzsch View Post
    Some crop advice, please, are these ok?
    Crop should be acceptable on all of those.

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Some crop advice, please, are these ok?

    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SMC_7021.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	532.6 KB
ID:	1077585

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EDC_7009.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	391.3 KB
ID:	1077586

    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ETN_706x.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	446.2 KB
ID:	1077587
    4.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIXD_7051.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	478.6 KB
ID:	1077588

    5. - Centering issue?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-TKQ_7238_crop.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	500.3 KB
ID:	1077589


    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Thank you Dana, I queued one pic now that has a nice reflection and might stand a slight chance, worth a try.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pkautzsch View Post
    How about this kind of rainy pictures? Unsure about contrast and brightness, also wondering if those should be "Night Shot" being taken about 1 hour before sunset with a strip of yellow sky reflecting on fuselage?

    1.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29683[/ATTACH]

    2.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29684[/ATTACH]

    3.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29685[/ATTACH]

    Thanks
    These three would be borderline for color/contrast issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    How about this kind of rainy pictures? Unsure about contrast and brightness, also wondering if those should be "Night Shot" being taken about 1 hour before sunset with a strip of yellow sky reflecting on fuselage?

    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	5809_D-AIHV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	811.5 KB
ID:	1043642

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	5781_D-AIZH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	883.2 KB
ID:	1043643

    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	5892_D-AIHE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	873.3 KB
ID:	1043644

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    As always, very helpful, really appreciate your effort, Dana!

    In the first I did not sharpen at all. It's just a bit cropped and resized to 1024 px, but indeed I thought it looked like oversharpened. You always learn something new...

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pkautzsch View Post
    Here are two pics I'm a bit doubtful about, wrt vignette and sharpness, care to comment?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29573[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29574[/ATTACH]

    Thank you
    Second would be ok for me, but the first is oversharpened and also shows signs of vignetting/vignetting overcorrection.

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Here are two pics I'm a bit doubtful about, wrt vignette and sharpness, care to comment?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	5008_D-AIZM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	459.1 KB
ID:	1043547

    Click image for larger version

Name:	5064_I-ADJV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	737.2 KB
ID:	1043548

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Thanks Dana! Screener comments are always helpful, and somehow I suspect you're the one who gives most of these, very much appreciated!
    Yeah, that's not intentional, no visible dust spots there, grass helps hiding them. Must have been quite some expectation bias making me miss that mistake before uploading and even when looking at the rejected picture! Actually it's quite obvious.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pkautzsch View Post
    Had a "Digital Manipulation" rejection which I don't quite know what to make of.
    Screener comment is "bad editing below aircraft". Don't think I edited anything except some dust spots in the sky. Maybe the screener thought the two boxes below the main gear were cloned out of one?
    Rejected image: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7582191
    Here's the un-edited camera JPG for comparison:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28824[/ATTACH]

    Asking especially because of the implications of a "manipulation" reject, glad for any input!
    Yeah, that was me. You've clearly done something to the grass below the aircraft (area circled in red), intentionally or not.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	45445_1568628171.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	731.0 KB
ID:	1042932

    It looked to me like it was unintentional, so I didn't add any warnings to your account. Just be careful with your editing in the future

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Had a "Digital Manipulation" rejection which I don't quite know what to make of.
    Screener comment is "bad editing below aircraft". Don't think I edited anything except some dust spots in the sky. Maybe the screener thought the two boxes below the main gear were cloned out of one?
    Rejected image: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7582191
    Here's the un-edited camera JPG for comparison:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3410.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	678.2 KB
ID:	1042929

    Asking especially because of the implications of a "manipulation" reject, glad for any input!

    Leave a comment:


  • pkautzsch
    replied
    Thank you once again, Dana, for your patience really appreciated!

    Usually I know about the 24/5 rule, seems I didn't properly look at the time when posting the next day, sorry about that!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pkautzsch View Post
    Here are some more doubt candidates I don't want to directly put in the queue, would anyone mind to comment?
    Especially wrt exposure/curves and heat haze.


    1
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28529[/ATTACH]


    2
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28530[/ATTACH]


    3
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28531[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline overexposed
    2-3 overexposed, noisy, oversharpened, heat haze

    Also, when you get a chance, please read here:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Try to keep your requests to a maximum 5 per 24 hours, or they stand the chance of being ignored by crew.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X