Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MartinezRoe7 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2420cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	521.5 KB
ID:	1022267
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8384g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	841.4 KB
ID:	1022268
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9676c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	541.2 KB
ID:	1022269
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6950c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	601.9 KB
ID:	1022270
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4359cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,023.3 KB
ID:	1022271

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. heat haze, blurry
    2-3 ok
    4. soft, contrast (too low)
    5. heat haze, contrast
    Thanks Dlowwa!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13607[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13608[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13609[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13610[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13611[/ATTACH]
    1. heat haze, blurry
    2-3 ok
    4. soft, contrast (too low)
    5. heat haze, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0013c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	807.1 KB
ID:	1022246
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1154cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	523.7 KB
ID:	1022247
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3039cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	527.8 KB
ID:	1022248
    Click image for larger version

Name:	PRMAG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	279.4 KB
ID:	1022249
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1999cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	781.3 KB
ID:	1022250

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    You can "bomb" us with questions. But maybe we don't answer that much. Stick to the 5 photos per day and wait for them to be answered.

    As for your question: I don't really understand, what you mean. dlowwa meant, that the photo as a bit of a yellow colour cast, which can lead to a rejection. Is that clear now?
    Now it's clearer to me (Discúlpame Gerardo, a veces uso el traductor y no me queda claro en ocasiones)
    No problems, 5 photos per day as an inquiry, they also seem more than enough, because if I were more I would consider it abuse.
    The rest is available to you.

    Many Thanks!
    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Thank you very much dlowwa!
    Now that I've learned how to upload photos to the forum, I'll "bomb" them with questions (I can, right?)
    A query:
    The borderline color (yellow) referred to? (I prefer to ask to learn)

    Regards!
    You can "bomb" us with questions. But maybe we don't answer that much. Stick to the 5 photos per day and wait for them to be answered.

    As for your question: I don't really understand, what you mean. dlowwa meant, that the photo as a bit of a yellow colour cast, which can lead to a rejection. Is that clear now?

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. heat haze
    2. borderline color (yellow)
    3-4 ok
    5. soft, blurry, noisy, color, contrast, compression
    Thank you very much dlowwa!
    Now that I've learned how to upload photos to the forum, I'll "bomb" them with questions (I can, right?)
    A query:
    The borderline color (yellow) referred to? (I prefer to ask to learn)

    Regards!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hello everyone, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos, before analyzing whether I upload them or not. Your opinion would be very helpful.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13547[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13548[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13549[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13550[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13551[/ATTACH]
    1. heat haze
    2. borderline color (yellow)
    3-4 ok
    5. soft, blurry, noisy, color, contrast, compression

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Hello everyone, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos, before analyzing whether I upload them or not. Your opinion would be very helpful.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8619cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	857.6 KB
ID:	1022206
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8514cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	663.9 KB
ID:	1022207
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1905cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	474.4 KB
ID:	1022208
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1935cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	439.1 KB
ID:	1022209
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0358cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	515.5 KB
ID:	1022210

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Looks like someone forgot to exclude it. We try to be as consistent as possible, but sometimes things get missed. I'll see that it is excluded as well.
    In my opinion (which can differ from yours without problems), both should be left, since it shows the most important thing of the plane (the mark of Pope Francis and the Vatican shield). They would pay "just for sinners" in case such a photo is excluded. Besides, it's not the only one I've seen out there, but I'm advocating what you tell me. But it's just an opinion, I always give it while it's in the JetPhotos rules.

    Thanks Dlowwa

    Regards from Chile
    Gustavo

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Dear Alex, I insist again on the subject ... and more than insist, I want to know what happened. Today I see that the same photo of the CC-BEK, of a friend, if it comes out in FR24.

    I insist that I didn't check the "exclude from Flight Radar" option. I do it because I don't want it to happen again not only with me, but with the rest of the spotters that we contribute to this page. I do it with pleasure, but these things seem strange to me.

    Greetings and I remain attentive to your comments
    Looks like someone forgot to exclude it. We try to be as consistent as possible, but sometimes things get missed. I'll see that it is excluded as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

    Regards
    Alex
    Dear Alex, I insist again on the subject ... and more than insist, I want to know what happened. Today I see that the same photo of the CC-BEK, of a friend, if it comes out in FR24.

    I insist that I didn't check the "exclude from Flight Radar" option. I do it because I don't want it to happen again not only with me, but with the rest of the spotters that we contribute to this page. I do it with pleasure, but these things seem strange to me.

    Greetings and I remain attentive to your comments

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

    Regards
    Alex
    OK, thanks Alex!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    I don't know if I should discuss in this topic, but I consult the following:
    More than 3 days ago I uploaded the CC-BEK photo, but in the FR24 app I don't see it reflected, being that it's more current than it already appears. I must clarify that I never put "exclude Flighr Radar" at the time of upload.
    Why does this happen?

    Greetings and thanks in advance.

    LATAM was the official transporter in Chile and Peru of Pope Francisco. In the photo, the plane that took Pope Fransisco on his fly to IQQ, and then take him to LIM. This was the fly where the Pope married a couple of crew from LATAM. CC-BEK. Airbus A321-211. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X