Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MartinezRoe7 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection.

    in the first photo I don't see that it's dark, it strikes me that they tell me that it is "dark / underexposed"

    in the second I don't see differences of light, although in comparison with the one that upload from the same date and same plane (although different angle), yes, it is avoidable, but I always prefer to have your opinion and thus continue improving.

    Thank you in advance


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6329264

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6329242

    Comment


    • #32
      Hi,
      The 707 isn't dark and I've now added the pic to the database

      For the Alitalia the light conditions were really too bad and I would recommend to keep that one for the personnal collection

      Regards
      Alex

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
        Hi,
        The 707 isn't dark and I've now added the pic to the database

        For the Alitalia the light conditions were really too bad and I would recommend to keep that one for the personnal collection

        Regards
        Alex
        Alex:

        As always, very kind of you and a thousand thanks for the help and advice.

        Greetings from Chile

        Comment


        • #34
          I don't know if I should discuss in this topic, but I consult the following:
          More than 3 days ago I uploaded the CC-BEK photo, but in the FR24 app I don't see it reflected, being that it's more current than it already appears. I must clarify that I never put "exclude Flighr Radar" at the time of upload.
          Why does this happen?

          Greetings and thanks in advance.

          https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8833259

          Comment


          • #35
            FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

            Regards
            Alex

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
              FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

              Regards
              Alex
              OK, thanks Alex!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                FR24 needs to show the whole scheme which isn't the case on your pic

                Regards
                Alex
                Dear Alex, I insist again on the subject ... and more than insist, I want to know what happened. Today I see that the same photo of the CC-BEK, of a friend, if it comes out in FR24.

                I insist that I didn't check the "exclude from Flight Radar" option. I do it because I don't want it to happen again not only with me, but with the rest of the spotters that we contribute to this page. I do it with pleasure, but these things seem strange to me.

                Greetings and I remain attentive to your comments

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
                  Dear Alex, I insist again on the subject ... and more than insist, I want to know what happened. Today I see that the same photo of the CC-BEK, of a friend, if it comes out in FR24.

                  I insist that I didn't check the "exclude from Flight Radar" option. I do it because I don't want it to happen again not only with me, but with the rest of the spotters that we contribute to this page. I do it with pleasure, but these things seem strange to me.

                  Greetings and I remain attentive to your comments
                  Looks like someone forgot to exclude it. We try to be as consistent as possible, but sometimes things get missed. I'll see that it is excluded as well.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Looks like someone forgot to exclude it. We try to be as consistent as possible, but sometimes things get missed. I'll see that it is excluded as well.
                    In my opinion (which can differ from yours without problems), both should be left, since it shows the most important thing of the plane (the mark of Pope Francis and the Vatican shield). They would pay "just for sinners" in case such a photo is excluded. Besides, it's not the only one I've seen out there, but I'm advocating what you tell me. But it's just an opinion, I always give it while it's in the JetPhotos rules.

                    Thanks Dlowwa

                    Regards from Chile
                    Gustavo

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hello everyone, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos, before analyzing whether I upload them or not. Your opinion would be very helpful.

                      Thanks in advance. Regards!


                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8619cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	857.6 KB
ID:	1022206
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8514cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	663.9 KB
ID:	1022207
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1905cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	474.4 KB
ID:	1022208
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1935cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	439.1 KB
ID:	1022209
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0358cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	515.5 KB
ID:	1022210

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
                        Hello everyone, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos, before analyzing whether I upload them or not. Your opinion would be very helpful.

                        Thanks in advance. Regards!


                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]13547[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]13548[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]13549[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]13550[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]13551[/ATTACH]
                        1. heat haze
                        2. borderline color (yellow)
                        3-4 ok
                        5. soft, blurry, noisy, color, contrast, compression

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          1. heat haze
                          2. borderline color (yellow)
                          3-4 ok
                          5. soft, blurry, noisy, color, contrast, compression
                          Thank you very much dlowwa!
                          Now that I've learned how to upload photos to the forum, I'll "bomb" them with questions (I can, right?)
                          A query:
                          The borderline color (yellow) referred to? (I prefer to ask to learn)

                          Regards!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
                            Thank you very much dlowwa!
                            Now that I've learned how to upload photos to the forum, I'll "bomb" them with questions (I can, right?)
                            A query:
                            The borderline color (yellow) referred to? (I prefer to ask to learn)

                            Regards!
                            You can "bomb" us with questions. But maybe we don't answer that much. Stick to the 5 photos per day and wait for them to be answered.

                            As for your question: I don't really understand, what you mean. dlowwa meant, that the photo as a bit of a yellow colour cast, which can lead to a rejection. Is that clear now?
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                              You can "bomb" us with questions. But maybe we don't answer that much. Stick to the 5 photos per day and wait for them to be answered.

                              As for your question: I don't really understand, what you mean. dlowwa meant, that the photo as a bit of a yellow colour cast, which can lead to a rejection. Is that clear now?
                              Now it's clearer to me (Discúlpame Gerardo, a veces uso el traductor y no me queda claro en ocasiones)
                              No problems, 5 photos per day as an inquiry, they also seem more than enough, because if I were more I would consider it abuse.
                              The rest is available to you.

                              Many Thanks!
                              Regards

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

                                Thanks in advance. Regards!

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0013c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	807.1 KB
ID:	1022246
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1154cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	523.7 KB
ID:	1022247
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3039cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	527.8 KB
ID:	1022248
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	PRMAG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	279.4 KB
ID:	1022249
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1999cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	781.3 KB
ID:	1022250

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X