Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MartinezRoe7 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

    Thanks in advance. Regards!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13607[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13608[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13609[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13610[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13611[/ATTACH]
    1. heat haze, blurry
    2-3 ok
    4. soft, contrast (too low)
    5. heat haze, contrast

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      1. heat haze, blurry
      2-3 ok
      4. soft, contrast (too low)
      5. heat haze, contrast
      Thanks Dlowwa!

      Comment


      • #48
        Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

        Thanks in advance. Regards!


        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2420cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	521.5 KB
ID:	1022267
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8384g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	841.4 KB
ID:	1022268
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9676c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	541.2 KB
ID:	1022269
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6950c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	601.9 KB
ID:	1022270
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4359cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,023.3 KB
ID:	1022271

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
          Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

          Thanks in advance. Regards!


          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13638[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13639[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13640[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13641[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13642[/ATTACH]
          1. soft & heat distortion
          2. heat distortion obstruction/clutter low contrast
          3. looks OK
          4. looks OK
          5. oversharpened

          DJ Reed/Screening Team

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by DJReed View Post
            1. soft & heat distortion
            2. heat distortion obstruction/clutter low contrast
            3. looks OK
            4. looks OK
            5. oversharpened

            DJ Reed/Screening Team
            thanks !!!

            Comment


            • #51
              Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

              Thanks in advance. Regards!

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6625cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	826.3 KB
ID:	1022301
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1885cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	573.5 KB
ID:	1022302
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2521cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	992.9 KB
ID:	1022303
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7883g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	530.3 KB
ID:	1022304
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8703c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	913.5 KB
ID:	1022305

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
                Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

                Thanks in advance. Regards!

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13678[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13679[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13680[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13681[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13682[/ATTACH]
                1. soft, heat haze
                2. soft, contrast
                3. heat haze, color, oversharpened
                4. borderline soft
                5. borderline soft/heat haze

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  1. soft, heat haze
                  2. soft, contrast
                  3. heat haze, color, oversharpened
                  4. borderline soft
                  5. borderline soft/heat haze
                  Thanks Dana!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection.

                    I understand that in the first, with the SuperTanker, I failed to add that it corresponds to the "Cargo" category, right?

                    Thanks in advance!

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366848
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366842

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
                      Hello, I would like to know your opinion regarding this rejection.

                      I understand that in the first, with the SuperTanker, I failed to add that it corresponds to the "Cargo" category, right?

                      Thanks in advance!

                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366848
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6366842
                      Hello

                      If you can see in the first Picture, there are some Jaggies who leads to the oversharpened rejection. Cargo should be the ticked, yes.
                      The second picture looks more blurry than soft, so not sure if you can fix this. But probably you have another picture of this plane and can try this.

                      Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
                      Best Regards from Germany,
                      Julian S.​

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                        Hello

                        If you can see in the first Picture, there are some Jaggies who leads to the oversharpened rejection. Cargo should be the ticked, yes.
                        The second picture looks more blurry than soft, so not sure if you can fix this. But probably you have another picture of this plane and can try this.

                        Hope this helps, have a nice evening!
                        Hi Julian!

                        How good it is to see you as a JP crew, congratulations!
                        With regard to the rejections, I imagined that it was Cargo, seeing the rejection I just understood that it was a charge. With regard to the "Jaggies", the first time I read that word, so I don't understand in a photo what it refers to (excuse my ignorance). Could you ask for help with this picture? (for inbox?)

                        As always, thanks for your tips!

                        Regards, from Chile

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

                          Thanks in advance. Regards!

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7221c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	646.7 KB
ID:	1022312
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7227c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	659.8 KB
ID:	1022313
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7419c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	542.6 KB
ID:	1022314
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7445c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	520.7 KB
ID:	1022315
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2127cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	670.1 KB
ID:	1022316

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Hi Julian!

                            How good it is to see you as a JP crew, congratulations!
                            With regard to the rejections, I imagined that it was Cargo, seeing the rejection I just understood that it was a charge. With regard to the "Jaggies", the first time I read that word, so I don't understand in a photo what it refers to (excuse my ignorance). Could you ask for help with this picture? (for inbox?)

                            As always, thanks for your tips!

                            Regards, from Chile
                            At first, thanks for your warm words!

                            For the Question to the Jaggies. Jaggies are those zig-zag lines in the image.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	Unbenannt6.PNG
Views:	1
Size:	29.8 KB
ID:	1022319Click image for larger version

Name:	Unbenannt7.PNG
Views:	1
Size:	27.0 KB
ID:	1022320Click image for larger version

Name:	Unbenannt8.PNG
Views:	1
Size:	18.4 KB
ID:	1022321
                            If you see those, you can be sure that the picture is oversharpened. Hope this is clear now. If not, here is the Wikipedia-Site for it.

                            Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
                            Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

                            Thanks in advance. Regards!

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13691[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13692[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13693[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13694[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13695[/ATTACH]
                            #1 looks a bit soft to me and it can profit from a bit more contrast too
                            #2 same as #1
                            #3 can profit from a bit more sharpening otherwise should be ok
                            #4 OK
                            #5 contrast because there is no direct sun on the aircraft, so if you have one with direct sun, i would try this.

                            Hope this helps, have a nice evening.
                            Last edited by Julian S.; 2018-02-10, 21:21.
                            Best Regards from Germany,
                            Julian S.​

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                              At first, thank your warm words!

                              For the Question to the Jaggies. Jaggies are those zig-zag lines in the image.
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]13698[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]13699[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]13700[/ATTACH]
                              If you see those, you can be sure that the picture is oversharpened. Hope this is clear now. If not, here is the Wikipedia-Site for it.

                              More technical, impossible! Great!!



                              #1 looks a bit soft to me and it can profit from a bit more contrast too
                              #2 same as #1
                              #3 can profit from a bit more sharpening otherwise should be ok
                              #4 OK
                              #5 contrast because there is no direct sun on the aircraft, so if you have one with direct sun, i would try this.

                              Hope this helps, have a nice evening.

                              More technical, impossible! Great!!
                              Millions of thanks, Julian!

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Hello again, I wanted to know your opinion regarding these photos.

                                Thanks in advance. Regards!

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1148cx.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	512.4 KB
ID:	1022376
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1212cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	563.1 KB
ID:	1022377
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1253cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	586.5 KB
ID:	1022378
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3120cc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	557.1 KB
ID:	1022379
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6927c.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	676.4 KB
ID:	1022380

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X