If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
2nd: How can I report an account that is uploading photos by modifying the capture date, since in Aeroparque (Buenos Aires, Argentina AEP / SABE), remodeling works began in June 2020, therefore itīs closed for all operations and appears uploading photos from October 2020?
3th: Can users with double accounts be reported?
You can contact me privately for both of these issues.
1st: It's ok this picture?
2nd: How can I report an account that is uploading photos by modifying the capture date, since in Aeroparque (Buenos Aires, Argentina AEP / SABE), remodeling works began in June 2020, therefore itīs closed for all operations and appears uploading photos from October 2020?
3th: Can users with double accounts be reported?
First one looks like it might need a touch of CCW, but is close enough for me. Second one has bad edit of the sky: edges are brighter than the center, and top right looks like poor dust removal or something.
Along with saying hello, I attach the following rejections to see your opinion.
In the first, I consider that it's badly rejected since according to my parameters it has a good horizon. It's seen in the platform, fence and building light towers.
In the second, he was rejected for bad process. While I agree with the rejection, I don't agree with the way it was handled.
I have never tried to clone the sky, I only erased a dust that appeared in the photograph and that I should have eliminated by choosing another photograph from that day.
I make it clear and I understand that what is sought is not to clone and pretend photographs that are not, but in my case I do not.
Thanks in advance !
First one looks like it might need a touch of CCW, but is close enough for me. Second one has bad edit of the sky: edges are brighter than the center, and top right looks like poor dust removal or something.
Along with saying hello, I attach the following rejections to see your opinion.
In the first, I consider that it's badly rejected since according to my parameters it has a good horizon. It's seen in the platform, fence and building light towers.
In the second, he was rejected for bad process. While I agree with the rejection, I don't agree with the way it was handled.
I have never tried to clone the sky, I only erased a dust that appeared in the photograph and that I should have eliminated by choosing another photograph from that day.
1-2. not ok
3. maybe ok
4. not ok. manipulation. If you submit this you would face a loss of upload slots/ban. Think very carefully before doing so.
5. no ok
1-2. not ok
3. maybe ok
4. not ok. manipulation. If you submit this you would face a loss of upload slots/ban. Think very carefully before doing so.
5. no ok
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: