Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Balders - Prescreening required please.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Balders
    replied
    Thanks for the reply and the advice!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Balders View Post
    Hi Screeners, I had this pic rejected today for (1) "Oversharpen" Having had problems with soft pics I have increased my sharpness overall (trying to avoid halos as I thought I had done here!).
    (2) "Bad Colour" I never do colour adjustments after having this problem in the past, So I am a bit lost with this one. (3) "Contrast" I increased the contrast on advice from a screener when I put it in for prescreen the other four pic's were accepted.
    Many thanks for your advice in advance.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Image is oversharpened, and the exaggerated blue cast is likely being made worse by the contrast being a little too strong. Should be fixable with suitable adjustments I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Hi Screeners, I had this pic rejected today for (1) "Oversharpen" Having had problems with soft pics I have increased my sharpness overall (trying to avoid halos as I thought I had done here!).
    (2) "Bad Colour" I never do colour adjustments after having this problem in the past, So I am a bit lost with this one. (3) "Contrast" I increased the contrast on advice from a screener when I put it in for prescreen the other four pic's were accepted.
    Many thanks for your advice in advance.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Hi dlowwa

    I used a new thread because I couldn't copy a link to the rejection in the quick reply. So I read this.
    How do I attach a file to a post?
    To attach a file to your post, you need to be using the main 'New Post' or 'New Thread' page and not 'Quick Reply'.
    Very sorry for any inconvenience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    dlowwa many thanks for your help again!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Balders View Post
    Hi all
    I am trying to upload a pic of a Vans RV-6, this particular aircraft didn't show up on auto fill! so i tried to fill manually but had no luck with that, as there are many of this type on the D/B I thought there may be a special area for Kit Planes, I have looked at the upload guidelines but could not see any reference to this!
    Clearly I am missing something here so any help would be most welcome.
    Aircraft -> Homebuilt Aircraft -> Vans -> Vans RV-6

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Hi all
    I am trying to upload a pic of a Vans RV-6, this particular aircraft didn't show up on auto fill! so i tried to fill manually but had no luck with that, as there are many of this type on the D/B I thought there may be a special area for Kit Planes, I have looked at the upload guidelines but could not see any reference to this!
    Clearly I am missing something here so any help would be most welcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Hi dlowwa, Thanks for getting back I do remember seeing this at some point.
    My photo editing is limited to removing dust spots only!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Balders View Post
    Thanks for the quick reply, is it acceptable to remove such a large object from a photo like a light head as in no1?
    Remove by editing? No, that would be considered manipulation, and could lead to an upload ban. Please don't do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Thanks for the quick reply, is it acceptable to remove such a large object from a photo like a light head as in no1?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Balders View Post
    Hi could a screener please have a look at these. 1[ATTACH=CONFIG]27750[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]27751[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]27752[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]27753[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]27754[/ATTACH]
    Many thanks in advance
    Contrast is a bit weak on most of them, but otherwise quality should be ok. Light post a bit distracting in #1 as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Hi could a screener please have a look at these. 1Click image for larger version

Name:	EW-400PO-Belavia-26.8.19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	369.1 KB
ID:	1042045 2Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FOGT-WESTJET-26.8.19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	287.9 KB
ID:	1042046 3Click image for larger version

Name:	G-MEDK-BA-26.8.19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	344.7 KB
ID:	1042047 4Click image for larger version

Name:	G-VIIY-BA-26.8.19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	275.6 KB
ID:	1042048 5Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZEN-easyJet-26.8.19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	341.9 KB
ID:	1042049
    Many thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    I think probably that's a typo on the appeal. CW is definitely what is needed. In the future, better to ask for help in the forum before appealing.
    Ok that's fine thanks for the quick response.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Balders View Post
    Hi Screeners help needed with this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7490963 The rejection says needs CW rotation, Appeal says CCW rotation!! I don't think it needs any (Fence post have been good enough in the past).
    And I am still not sure about adding more contrast!!
    Many thank for your advice in advance
    I think probably that's a typo on the appeal. CW is definitely what is needed. In the future, better to ask for help in the forum before appealing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Hi Screeners help needed with this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7490963 The rejection says needs CW rotation, Appeal says CCW rotation!! I don't think it needs any (Fence post have been good enough in the past).
    And I am still not sure about adding more contrast!!
    Many thank for your advice in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • Balders
    replied
    Thanks for coming back.
    The screener did say in the email a touch sharper would be ok!

    I have another that has been rejected for the same and I will appeal that one as it seems fairly similar.

    Thanks again dlowwa.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X