Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pta Aviation - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0134-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	385.8 KB
ID:	1022089 2.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0090-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	513.1 KB
ID:	1022090 3Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0200.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	597.1 KB
ID:	1022091 4.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0256.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	733.9 KB
ID:	1022092

    Hi there. Please pre-screen 1 and 2. And I'm still waiting for feedback on 3 and 4 on what is meant by that they have harsh contrast, and how I can fix it. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still borderline, but probably ok.
    Okay. Thank you very much for the feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: maybe a tad dark
    2: OK
    3 and 4: soft and harsh contrast
    Hi there. I just wanted to know for 3 and 4 what is meant by harsh contrast and how I can fix it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Pta Aviation View Post
    I've increased the exposure a bit. Is it better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13385[/ATTACH]
    Still borderline, but probably ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    I've increased the exposure a bit. Is it better?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0010-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	550.1 KB
ID:	1022061

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: maybe a tad dark
    2: OK
    3 and 4: soft and harsh contrast
    Thank you for the feedback. Could you please clarify what you mean by harsh contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Pta Aviation View Post
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13369[/ATTACH] 2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13370[/ATTACH] 3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13371[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13372[/ATTACH]

    Hi there. Please pre screen. Thank you.
    1: maybe a tad dark
    2: OK
    3 and 4: soft and harsh contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0010.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	579.8 KB
ID:	1022045 2.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0071.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	393.6 KB
ID:	1022046 3.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0200.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	597.1 KB
ID:	1022047
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0255.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	803.5 KB
ID:	1022048

    Hi there. Please pre screen. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
    Looks ok to me.
    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • B7772ADL
    replied
    Originally posted by Pta Aviation View Post
    Hi there. Please pre-screen this photo. Thank you.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13289[/ATTACH]
    Looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Hi there. Please pre-screen this photo. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0026.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	711.2 KB
ID:	1021974

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey,

    I agree with the screeners decision. The Image is way too dark, what you can see in the edited picture below. (left side edited, right side your origanal)
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13212[/ATTACH]

    Have a nice start in the new week!
    Okay. I see it now. Thank you for the feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by Pta Aviation View Post
    Hi there. Here is another photo that was also rejected for dark/underexposed even though again, as both histograms clearly show, that is not the case. I have appealed this rejection and am waiting for the outcome.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6307189

    https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1515611874.jpg

    https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1515611874.jpg
    Hey,

    I agree with the screeners decision. The Image is way too dark, what you can see in the edited picture below. (left side edited, right side your origanal)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	22759_1515611874.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	486.7 KB
ID:	1021909

    Have a nice start in the new week!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Hi there. Here is another photo that was also rejected for dark/underexposed even though again, as both histograms clearly show, that is not the case. I have appealed this rejection and am waiting for the outcome.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6307189

    https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1515611874.jpg

    https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1515611874.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Pta Aviation
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    I agree underexposed was the wrong rejection reason. Contrast is a bit of an issue; the improved version looks better to me, but can't promise it would pass screening.
    Okay. Thanks for the feedback. I'll upload the improved version and see how it goes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X