Pta Aviation - Editing advice

[Pta Aviation]

1. 2. 3 4.

Hi there. Please pre-screen 1 and 2. And I'm still waiting for feedback on 3 and 4 on what is meant by that they have harsh contrast, and how I can fix it. Thank you.

[Pta Aviation]

Still borderline, but probably ok.

Okay. Thank you very much for the feedback.

[Pta Aviation]

1: maybe a tad dark
2: OK
3 and 4: soft and harsh contrast

Hi there. I just wanted to know for 3 and 4 what is meant by harsh contrast and how I can fix it.

[dlowwa]

I've increased the exposure a bit. Is it better?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13385[/ATTACH]

Still borderline, but probably ok.

[Pta Aviation]

I've increased the exposure a bit. Is it better?

[Pta Aviation]

1: maybe a tad dark
2: OK
3 and 4: soft and harsh contrast

Thank you for the feedback. Could you please clarify what you mean by harsh contrast.

[LX-A343]

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13369[/ATTACH] 2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13370[/ATTACH] 3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13371[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13372[/ATTACH]

Hi there. Please pre screen. Thank you.

1: maybe a tad dark
2: OK
3 and 4: soft and harsh contrast

[Pta Aviation]

1. 2. 3.
4.

Hi there. Please pre screen. Thank you.

[Pta Aviation]

Looks ok to me.

Thank you.

[B7772ADL]

Hi there. Please pre-screen this photo. Thank you.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13289[/ATTACH]

Looks ok to me.

[Pta Aviation]

Hi there. Please pre-screen this photo. Thank you.

[Pta Aviation]

Hey,

I agree with the screeners decision. The Image is way too dark, what you can see in the edited picture below. (left side edited, right side your origanal)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13212[/ATTACH]

Have a nice start in the new week!

Okay. I see it now. Thank you for the feedback.

[Julian S.]

Hi there. Here is another photo that was also rejected for dark/underexposed even though again, as both histograms clearly show, that is not the case. I have appealed this rejection and am waiting for the outcome.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6307189

https://www.jetphotos.com/members/showphotoinfo.php?loc=rej&id=6307189&type=1&photo=https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/22759_1515611874.jpg

https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1515611874.jpg

Hey,

I agree with the screeners decision. The Image is way too dark, what you can see in the edited picture below. (left side edited, right side your origanal)


Have a nice start in the new week!

[Pta Aviation]

Hi there. Here is another photo that was also rejected for dark/underexposed even though again, as both histograms clearly show, that is not the case. I have appealed this rejection and am waiting for the outcome.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6307189

https://www.jetphotos.com/members/showphotoinfo.php?loc=rej&id=6307189&type=1&photo=https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/22759_1515611874.jpg

https://www.jetphotos.com/members/showphotoinfo.php?loc=rej&id=6307189&type=4&photo=https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/22759_1515611874.jpg

[Pta Aviation]

I agree underexposed was the wrong rejection reason. Contrast is a bit of an issue; the improved version looks better to me, but can't promise it would pass screening.

Okay. Thanks for the feedback. I'll upload the improved version and see how it goes.