Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Majky737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I have received some rejects due Undersharpened/Soft. I have added some extra sharpening and looking for advice, if actual level of sharpeness is good enought or not. Photos are attached below.

    Thank you for feedback.

    Marian

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24466[/ATTACH]


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24467[/ATTACH]
    Both would still be soft (and probably contrast) rejections for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Sharpening level

    Hello,

    I have received some rejects due Undersharpened/Soft. I have added some extra sharpening and looking for advice, if actual level of sharpeness is good enought or not. Photos are attached below.

    Thank you for feedback.

    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-BSC_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	640.8 KB
ID:	1035131


    Click image for larger version

Name:	N151W_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	774.6 KB
ID:	1035132

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Thank you. I made one more edit, will be happy if you can comment it:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22671[/ATTACH]
    Borderline at best. Still soft in some areas, but starting to get oversharpened in others.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still quite soft. Contrast would be borderline for me.
    Thank you. I made one more edit, will be happy if you can comment it:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MKO_III.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	676.7 KB
ID:	1033673

    Leave a comment:


  • CFebra
    replied
    It seems better

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Thank you dlowwa.

    Meanwhile, I have one more reject here:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7169470

    I made some contrast adjustements. Does this new version looks better? Thank you.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22664[/ATTACH]

    Marian
    Still quite soft. Contrast would be borderline for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Thank you dlowwa.

    Meanwhile, I have one more reject here:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7169470

    I made some contrast adjustements. Does this new version looks better? Thank you.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MKO_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	643.6 KB
ID:	1033666

    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I have received this reject:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7169465

    I want to ask how level this photo properly? I used poles and buildings in backround as reference.

    Thank you.
    Marian
    Verticals indeed look ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    I have received this reject:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7169465

    I want to ask how level this photo properly? I used poles and buildings in backround as reference.

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I have received this reject:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152471

    Do I have to use CW or CCW rotation? And how much proximetly?

    Thanks
    Marian
    Needs ccw rotation. I didn't check it in PS, but use the pole as reference. Maybe 0.5-1.0

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    I have received this reject:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152471

    Do I have to use CW or CCW rotation? And how much proximetly?

    Thanks
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I have a question. Is the aiplane on attached photo obstructed too much to reject this photo? I know that ground equipment is on the right side of aircraft, but I am not sure if it is classified as obstruction on this angle.

    Thank you for reply,

    Kind regards
    Marian

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21210[/ATTACH]
    Borderline obstructed yes (would be ok for me), but also backlit, glare, and low contrast (would not be ok for me).

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I have a question. Is the aiplane on attached photo obstructed too much to reject this photo? I know that ground equipment is on the right side of aircraft, but I am not sure if it is classified as obstruction on this angle.

    Thank you for reply,

    Kind regards
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-IHD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	726.4 KB
ID:	1032459

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Appears to be a Robinson R44, private owner likely. Can't help with cn.
    I found it out - on FR24 it has appeared as G-VVBL. So you are right, it is Robinson R44 Raven II with C/N 11606.

    So I will upload it with it's new reg later today. Thanks for help

    Click image for larger version

Name:	GVVBL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	26.7 KB
ID:	1032294

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I have problems uploading this photo:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21020[/ATTACH]

    Helicopter has registration OM-RRR. I made some research on web (including scramble.nl), but I can not find any info about this reg - type, cn, operator, nothing. Does anyone know at least some data about this heli?

    Thank you.

    Kind regards
    Marian
    Appears to be a Robinson R44, private owner likely. Can't help with cn.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X