Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Majky737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Ok, nice, thank you very much.

    I have one more question regarding this reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I made some adjustments as well. However, I am not sure if issues are fixed. Can you take a look?
    Many thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25374[/ATTACH]
    Borderline contrast (blown out sky) but would also be acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Maybe a touch too much magenta, but would be ok for me.
    Ok, nice, thank you very much.

    I have one more question regarding this reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I made some adjustments as well. However, I am not sure if issues are fixed. Can you take a look?
    Many thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0745_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1040003

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    I made a little adjustment. Is the new edit somehow better?

    Thank you.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25367[/ATTACH]
    Maybe a touch too much magenta, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    White balance is too warm (yellow).
    I made a little adjustment. Is the new edit somehow better?

    Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	05-0730_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	691.5 KB
ID:	1039996

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I have received another reject, this time due Bad Colors. What is wrong with this photo? Colors looks fine to me, is there any color cast?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7342030
    White balance is too warm (yellow).

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    I have received another reject, this time due Bad Colors. What is wrong with this photo? Colors looks fine to me, is there any color cast?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    First of all, I want to apologize for using one photo from my queue in following question, but I don't know how to show point of my question without it. So, when I have photo on queue and I hit "check for dustspots" button, I get image like this:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25275[/ATTACH]

    In red circle, I see some unusual objects. As I am not sure if this is jpeg compression, I open image again in PS, but here I don't see these objects:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25276[/ATTACH]

    So question which I wanted to ask is:
    Which equalized version should I believe more? PS one or JP one? I think, there is nothing wrong on unequalized version as well on PS one. In the past, somebody wrote on this forum that JP equalizer is stronger then PS Equalize function - is this information correct?
    Yeah, just looks like compression. Without seeing the actual image in question, can't say whether it would be an issue when screened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    First of all, I want to apologize for using one photo from my queue in following question, but I don't know how to show point of my question without it. So, when I have photo on queue and I hit "check for dustspots" button, I get image like this:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	767_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	320.0 KB
ID:	1039909

    In red circle, I see some unusual objects. As I am not sure if this is jpeg compression, I open image again in PS, but here I don't see these objects:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	767_I.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	265.7 KB
ID:	1039910

    So question which I wanted to ask is:
    Which equalized version should I believe more? PS one or JP one? I think, there is nothing wrong on unequalized version as well on PS one. In the past, somebody wrote on this forum that JP equalizer is stronger then PS Equalize function - is this information correct?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Meanwhile, I have received reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I reworked this one using curves (weather was not the best but I still think there was enought light to tune this photo), I will be happy if you can say your feedback (especially contrast issues).
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25254[/ATTACH]
    Still very likely a contrast rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Couldn't tell you for certain then. Usually that kind of compression is a result of a filter (especially NR) being applied. Maybe you didn't apply a specific filter, but there was NR done in camera or when converting from RAW?
    So I made some investigation and looks like it was there right on output file from camera. I don't know, maybe some filter was applied, I just don't remember if I changed any settings. However, compression is on all pictures of that two planes, so they are lost. Pity, but thank you for your help and time.

    Meanwhile, I have received reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I reworked this one using curves (weather was not the best but I still think there was enought light to tune this photo), I will be happy if you can say your feedback (especially contrast issues).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-89117_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	569.0 KB
ID:	1039890


    Thank you
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Negative. I don't use filters at all. I have one photo accepted from that batch, so it is hard to find the reason of compression for me. I did nothing special or different when taking photos as well on editing. I will try to check other images made that day, maybe some of them will be better.
    Couldn't tell you for certain then. Usually that kind of compression is a result of a filter (especially NR) being applied. Maybe you didn't apply a specific filter, but there was NR done in camera or when converting from RAW?

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Sky is fairly compressed. Did you use any NR filters?
    Negative. I don't use filters at all. I have one photo accepted from that batch, so it is hard to find the reason of compression for me. I did nothing special or different when taking photos as well on editing. I will try to check other images made that day, maybe some of them will be better.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Sky is fairly compressed. Did you use any NR filters?

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Might be useful if we could actually see the two rejections in question.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    My last two rejects have reason "JPEG compression artifacts". Where is this compression on these images? Is there any way to fix them?
    Might be useful if we could actually see the two rejections in question.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X