Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Majky737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    can anyone help me to fix this photo?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6864824

    Maybe some of these edits is better on contrast?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-64014_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	824.6 KB
ID:	1031094
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-64014_III.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	725.5 KB
ID:	1031095

    Thank you.

    Regards
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Borderline acceptable for me, but there are some soft areas along the fuselage.
    Ok, I have added some extra sharpening and uploaded photo into queue. Thanks for help

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I need little advice how to fix photo rejected here:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6860680

    Are there any parts soft or overall photo is soft?

    Thank you for help.
    Regards
    Marian
    Borderline acceptable for me, but there are some soft areas along the fuselage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    I need little advice how to fix photo rejected here:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6860680

    Are there any parts soft or overall photo is soft?

    Thank you for help.
    Regards
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I have received reject of this photo:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6851664

    I made some adjustment of contrast, exposure and added some extra sharpening resulting to this:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19354[/ATTACH]

    is the new edit better? Or do you suggest to start again from scratch?

    Thank you
    Kind regards
    Marian
    Exposure is fine, contrast borderline, but still really soft. DOF might just be too low for this to be fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I have received reject of this photo:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6851664

    I made some adjustment of contrast, exposure and added some extra sharpening resulting to this:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-YBA_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	664.3 KB
ID:	1030935

    is the new edit better? Or do you suggest to start again from scratch?

    Thank you
    Kind regards
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    is photo attached below sharp enought? As I am unsure, can somebody confirm that correct reg is MM54505?

    Thank you.
    Kind regards
    Marian

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19051[/ATTACH]
    Looks a bit soft. Not sure about the reg., but you can check Scramble.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    is photo attached below sharp enought? As I am unsure, can somebody confirm that correct reg is MM54505?

    Thank you.
    Kind regards
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	MM54505.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	776.8 KB
ID:	1030680

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Do you think it is passable due borderline contrast? Or does it depends on screener who will screen it?
    Probably ok, but that's not a certainty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still borderline for contrast. Overcast skies, not much more you can do.
    Do you think it is passable due borderline contrast? Or does it depends on screener who will screen it?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi Dana, thank you for your comment. Maybe this new version is a little better? I added some exposure and increased contrast a little.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18936[/ATTACH]
    Still borderline for contrast. Overcast skies, not much more you can do.

    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    I have one more picture - reedited after reject due softness and contrast.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18937[/ATTACH]
    Would again be rejected for soft and contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi Dana, thank you for your comment. Maybe this new version is a little better? I added some exposure and increased contrast a little.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	RJF04_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	833.6 KB
ID:	1030586


    I have one more picture - reedited after reject due softness and contrast.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-EED_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	534.9 KB
ID:	1030587

    Regards
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I seek for advice how to improve contrast on this photo. Any suggestion is more then welcome.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18920[/ATTACH]

    Regards
    Marian
    Contrast is too low. Also a bit dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I seek for advice how to improve contrast on this photo. Any suggestion is more then welcome.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	RJF04.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	807.9 KB
ID:	1030570

    Regards
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I want to ask question, which is more about correct data then prescreening... therefore I hope it will be ok if I have affected photo in queue. I have uploaded photo of req. 1014 (cn 361014). Aircraft type was selected by system. However, checking data in queue, aircraft type is now filed as:

    PZL-Swidnik W-3WA Sokó?

    Question mark was suspicious to me, so I checked this frame on JP and it was uploaded in the past as:

    PZL-Swidnik W3 Sokol
    PZL-Swidnik W-3WA Sokó?
    PZL-Swidnik W-3WA Sokół

    I made a little test and by selecting PZL-Swidnik W-3WA Sokół in form, I get PZL-Swidnik W-3WA Sokó? on "Manage queued photos" page. Should I leave type as PZL-Swidnik W-3WA Sokó? with question mark?

    Thank you for your advice.

    Marian
    I think that's just a little bug with the script. Non-English characters sometimes show up as such. If the system autofilled it that way, you should be safe.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X