Majky737 - Editing Advice

[Majky737]

Hello,

I have some difficulieties to identify soft spots on this one:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11982256

Can you help me? Is the whole aircraft soft or only specific parts?

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I have some difficulieties to identify soft spots on this one:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11982256

Can you help me? Is the whole aircraft soft or only specific parts?

Thank you.

Left side/tail area is a bit soft.

[Majky737]

Left side/tail area is a bit soft.

Thank you. I will fix the issue.

I have received one more reject here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11982257

I have played with curves a little and I want to ask, if this version is somehow better:


If not, is there any chance to recommend how to process it in better way?

Thank you

M.

[dlowwa]

Thank you. I will fix the issue.

I have received one more reject here:


I have played with curves a little and I want to ask, if this version is somehow better:

If not, is there any chance to recommend how to process it in better way?

A touch soft, otherwise ok for me.

[Majky737]

Hello,

As I have received following reject, I took another photo from batch and processed it. However, I am not fully sure if it is sharp and if heat disortion is there killing this photo. Can you prescreen it for me?

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

As I have received following reject, I took another photo from batch and processed it. However, I am not fully sure if it is sharp and if heat disortion is there killing this photo. Can you prescreen it for me?

Soft/heat hazed.

[Majky737]

Thank you.

I have one more reject for JPEG compression, made a new edit, is it somehow better or still compression kills the photo?

[dlowwa]

Thank you.

I have one more reject for JPEG compression, made a new edit, is it somehow better or still compression kills the photo?

Sky is very noisy/blotchy.

[Majky737]

Sky is very noisy/blotchy.

Ok thank you. I know it is hard to fix this issue, but before I pass this photo out, I wand to ask you for prescreening one last edit of it. If it still shows compression in sky, I will leave it.

Thank you for your time

[dlowwa]

Ok thank you. I know it is hard to fix this issue, but before I pass this photo out, I wand to ask you for prescreening one last edit of it. If it still shows compression in sky, I will leave it.

Thank you for your time

Same issue persists.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I would like to ask for pre-screening of following image, as I had some problems to set contrast and sharpening and I am not fully sure it is ok.

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I would like to ask for pre-screening of following image, as I had some problems to set contrast and sharpening and I am not fully sure it is ok.

Heat hazed and a bit dark.

[Majky737]

Today I have received a reject linked here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12174556

as previous edit was rejected for being undersharpened, I have added some sharpening. However, photo is rejected for undersharpening and blurry. I have reviewed the image, but I am not sure - are there any specific parts blurry/undersharpened or whole aircraft in general? I somehow can not identify it. Does it worth to add more sharpening or is it one for PC?

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Today I have received a reject linked here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12174556

as previous edit was rejected for being undersharpened, I have added some sharpening. However, photo is rejected for undersharpening and blurry. I have reviewed the image, but I am not sure - are there any specific parts blurry/undersharpened or whole aircraft in general? I somehow can not identify it. Does it worth to add more sharpening or is it one for PC?

Thank you.

Can't tell for sure because of the resolution, but it's either a bit blurry, or extremely soft. The whole aircraft.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I want to ask for some help on this rejected picture:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12251474

as it was rejected for being overexposed. I checked it again, but I still think it is not so bad, as details are visible and I don't think there are blown out areas on fuselage. Should I try to process it again, or somehow adjust exposure via curves in PS?

Thank you
M.