Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Majky737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Negative. I don't use filters at all. I have one photo accepted from that batch, so it is hard to find the reason of compression for me. I did nothing special or different when taking photos as well on editing. I will try to check other images made that day, maybe some of them will be better.
    Couldn't tell you for certain then. Usually that kind of compression is a result of a filter (especially NR) being applied. Maybe you didn't apply a specific filter, but there was NR done in camera or when converting from RAW?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      Couldn't tell you for certain then. Usually that kind of compression is a result of a filter (especially NR) being applied. Maybe you didn't apply a specific filter, but there was NR done in camera or when converting from RAW?
      So I made some investigation and looks like it was there right on output file from camera. I don't know, maybe some filter was applied, I just don't remember if I changed any settings. However, compression is on all pictures of that two planes, so they are lost. Pity, but thank you for your help and time.

      Meanwhile, I have received reject:
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7331502

      I reworked this one using curves (weather was not the best but I still think there was enought light to tune this photo), I will be happy if you can say your feedback (especially contrast issues).
      Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-89117_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	569.0 KB
ID:	1039890


      Thank you
      Marian

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
        Meanwhile, I have received reject:
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7331502

        I reworked this one using curves (weather was not the best but I still think there was enought light to tune this photo), I will be happy if you can say your feedback (especially contrast issues).
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25254[/ATTACH]
        Still very likely a contrast rejection.

        Comment


        • Hi,

          First of all, I want to apologize for using one photo from my queue in following question, but I don't know how to show point of my question without it. So, when I have photo on queue and I hit "check for dustspots" button, I get image like this:
          Click image for larger version

Name:	767_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	320.0 KB
ID:	1039909

          In red circle, I see some unusual objects. As I am not sure if this is jpeg compression, I open image again in PS, but here I don't see these objects:
          Click image for larger version

Name:	767_I.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	265.7 KB
ID:	1039910

          So question which I wanted to ask is:
          Which equalized version should I believe more? PS one or JP one? I think, there is nothing wrong on unequalized version as well on PS one. In the past, somebody wrote on this forum that JP equalizer is stronger then PS Equalize function - is this information correct?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
            Hi,

            First of all, I want to apologize for using one photo from my queue in following question, but I don't know how to show point of my question without it. So, when I have photo on queue and I hit "check for dustspots" button, I get image like this:
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]25275[/ATTACH]

            In red circle, I see some unusual objects. As I am not sure if this is jpeg compression, I open image again in PS, but here I don't see these objects:
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]25276[/ATTACH]

            So question which I wanted to ask is:
            Which equalized version should I believe more? PS one or JP one? I think, there is nothing wrong on unequalized version as well on PS one. In the past, somebody wrote on this forum that JP equalizer is stronger then PS Equalize function - is this information correct?
            Yeah, just looks like compression. Without seeing the actual image in question, can't say whether it would be an issue when screened.

            Comment


            • Hi,

              I have received another reject, this time due Bad Colors. What is wrong with this photo? Colors looks fine to me, is there any color cast?

              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7342030

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
                Hi,

                I have received another reject, this time due Bad Colors. What is wrong with this photo? Colors looks fine to me, is there any color cast?

                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7342030
                White balance is too warm (yellow).

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  White balance is too warm (yellow).
                  I made a little adjustment. Is the new edit somehow better?

                  Thank you.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	05-0730_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	691.5 KB
ID:	1039996

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
                    I made a little adjustment. Is the new edit somehow better?

                    Thank you.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25367[/ATTACH]
                    Maybe a touch too much magenta, but would be ok for me.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      Maybe a touch too much magenta, but would be ok for me.
                      Ok, nice, thank you very much.

                      I have one more question regarding this reject:
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7364074

                      I made some adjustments as well. However, I am not sure if issues are fixed. Can you take a look?
                      Many thanks.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	0745_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1040003

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
                        Ok, nice, thank you very much.

                        I have one more question regarding this reject:
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7364074

                        I made some adjustments as well. However, I am not sure if issues are fixed. Can you take a look?
                        Many thanks.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25374[/ATTACH]
                        Borderline contrast (blown out sky) but would also be acceptable for me.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          Borderline contrast (blown out sky) but would also be acceptable for me.
                          Thank you very much Dana, I really appreciate your help.

                          Marian

                          Comment


                          • Hello,

                            I have here one reject for overexposure:

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7352228

                            I made a new edit (attached), however, I am unsure about exposure/contrast. Opinion of someone else is more then welcome.

                            Thank you
                            Marian

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-JOH_II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	963.7 KB
ID:	1040105

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
                              Hello,

                              I have here one reject for overexposure:

                              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7352228

                              I made a new edit (attached), however, I am unsure about exposure/contrast. Opinion of someone else is more then welcome.

                              Thank you
                              Marian

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25502[/ATTACH]
                              Borderline soft, but would be acceptable for me.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                Borderline soft, but would be acceptable for me.
                                Thank you, I have added some extra sharpening. Photo is now queued.

                                Have a good rest of weekend

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X