Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Majky737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    today I have received 2 reject for dirty CMOS (PHOTO1, PHOTO2). So I have reviewed both photos and made a new edits trying clone out dustspots.

    Can you give me quick hint if the problem with dustspots is resolved on these new edits? If no, can you help me to find dust spots still present on images?

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LPF_II.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	788.3 KB
ID:	1163301
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A7-BCD_II.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	462.0 KB
ID:	1163302
    First shot looks like it has some halos around the tail and top of the aircraft

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    today I have received 2 reject for dirty CMOS (PHOTO1, PHOTO2). So I have reviewed both photos and made a new edits trying clone out dustspots.

    Can you give me quick hint if the problem with dustspots is resolved on these new edits? If no, can you help me to find dust spots still present on images?

    Thank you.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LPF_II.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	788.3 KB
ID:	1163301
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A7-BCD_II.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	462.0 KB
ID:	1163302

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    can you help me to identify soft spots on this rejected photo?

    PHOTO

    Thank you for your time.
    Marian
    Whole fuselage looks kind of soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    can you help me to identify soft spots on this rejected photo?

    PHOTO

    Thank you for your time.
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post

    Thank you. In your opinion, does it have chance to be accepted as is or are there any issues to fix I should focus on?
    Horizon is off and it's a touch soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Close, but not quite backlit.
    Thank you. In your opinion, does it have chance to be accepted as is or are there any issues to fix I should focus on?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello jetPhotos crew,

    can you help me to determine if attached photo should be rejected for backlit or not? I am somehow unable to say if tail is on it's own shadow or not.
    Close, but not quite backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello jetPhotos crew,

    can you help me to determine if attached photo should be rejected for backlit or not? I am somehow unable to say if tail is on it's own shadow or not.

    Thank you for your comments.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B-17881.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	768.1 KB
ID:	1161855

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I have received this reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I made another edit of another image from same photos batch hoping to resolve compression issue.

    Is the new edit acceptable in therms of compression, colors and contrast?
    Rejected (and new) image was fine for me in terms of color, but both show some heat haze.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I have received this reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I made another edit of another image from same photos batch hoping to resolve compression issue.

    Is the new edit acceptable in therms of compression, colors and contrast?

    Thank you for your time.

    Kind regards
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N711CL_II.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	696.8 KB
ID:	1161507

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello screeners,

    today I have received photo reject due undersharpened and noise HERE

    I have added some extra sharpening and some noise reduction as well. Can you give me hint if there is any improvement visible on new edit and if it is maybe acceptable as - is now?
    Still lots of soft areas. Not sure the quality is there to make this workable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello screeners,

    today I have received photo reject due undersharpened and noise HERE

    I have added some extra sharpening and some noise reduction as well. Can you give me hint if there is any improvement visible on new edit and if it is maybe acceptable as - is now?

    Thank you for your time.
    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P4-EYE_II.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	431.6 KB
ID:	1159409

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post

    I think that it is ok, as intentions of this question were to find noise areas, reprocess and queue again.

    However, I think problem was related to sky area, so I have applied some more noise reduction filter there. Can you prescreen new edit attached below?
    Sorry, I think I meant to post that reply in a different thread..though I think it mostly applies here. Wouldn't have been a rejection for me, but I can kind of see why it might have been for someone else. Newer version slightly soft, but also ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline for me, but enough for a rejection for the two screeners who screened it. Not much chance of a successful appeal.
    I think that it is ok, as intentions of this question were to find noise areas, reprocess and queue again.

    However, I think problem was related to sky area, so I have applied some more noise reduction filter there. Can you prescreen new edit attached below?

    Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MFE_VI.jpg
Views:	134
Size:	612.2 KB
ID:	1146081

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I have received this reject for Noise/grain:

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    In what areas of photo is noise visible? Will selective noise reduction help in this case?
    Borderline for me, but enough for a rejection for the two screeners who screened it. Not much chance of a successful appeal.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X