Originally posted by dlowwa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Majky737 - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
I am sorry. I have some difficult times to find horizont level on this one. So I have tried to slope the horizont by 0.5 degree. Do you think the result is somehow better or still need more CCW rotation? I do not want to overshoot it again.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Don't see much difference between this one and rejected version
Thank you
M.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
Thank you. I think I found correct leveling. I have added only minimum angle to original image and when I compare all three edits, this one looks that it might be leveled well. I must admit, it is somehow hard to me to find correct leveling on this one, even there are many verticals as references.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
A bit too much. You want to get it so that the edges of the buildings are as close to vertical as possible.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Majky737 View PostHello,
I want to ask for some help with this reject due to Horizont Unlevel:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I have checked again using Horizont tool but verticals looks fine to me. Does it need any rotation? If so, CW or CCW?
Thank you.
M.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello,
I want to ask for some help with this reject due to Horizont Unlevel:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I have checked again using Horizont tool but verticals looks fine to me. Does it need any rotation? If so, CW or CCW?
Thank you.
M.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Majky737 View PostHello,
I am seeking for some advice on this reject:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I have started once again with processing and want to ask if new edit is somehow better or not. To be honest, I can not figure out what caused jpeg compression, as I save pictures on maximum quality and I did not changed my processing flow:
Secondly, I want to ask you for prescreening of following picture, as I have bad experiences with taking pictures trought glass
Leave a comment:
-
Hello,
I am seeking for some advice on this reject:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I have started once again with processing and want to ask if new edit is somehow better or not. To be honest, I can not figure out what caused jpeg compression, as I save pictures on maximum quality and I did not changed my processing flow:
Secondly, I want to ask you for prescreening of following picture, as I have bad experiences with taking pictures trought glass
Thank you for your time.
Marian
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
I have two more pics to ask:
1. - my intention was to process this picture as ramp shot. However, I am not sure if lamp posts obstructing Airbuses are not too disturbing. Will be ramp shot like that rejected of obstruction as well?
2. - I have visited TWA hotel and taken shot of Connie, however I forget my 15 - 55 lenses so I had to use my Phone. As this edit's origin is phone, do you think it might be acceptable, or the quality is simply not there?
Thank you for your time and reply.
M.
2. borderline oversharpened/compression, and a bit soft/blurry on the right side
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Tug ok; stairs blocking the tug not ok.
I have two more pics to ask:
1. - my intention was to process this picture as ramp shot. However, I am not sure if lamp posts obstructing Airbuses are not too disturbing. Will be ramp shot like that rejected of obstruction as well?
2. - I have visited TWA hotel and taken shot of Connie, however I forget my 15 - 55 lenses so I had to use my Phone. As this edit's origin is phone, do you think it might be acceptable, or the quality is simply not there?
Thank you for your time and reply.
M.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: