Originally posted by dlowwa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Yousaf Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Frame = aircraft, i.e. serial/cn/reg/bu. number, etc..
The sources I have found are
Registration: 131
Construction Number: Unknown
Model Cessna 310K
Operator: Saqr al-Jazira Aviation MuseumPicture of Cessna 310K taken at Riyadh - King Khaled International (RUH / OERK), Saudi Arabia by Steve Cos on ABPic
The twin-engined six-seats Cessna 310K reg. 131, operated by RSAF.
131 Cessna 310K
Comment
-
Originally posted by yousaf View Post
Couldn't find its Serial number.
The sources I have found are
Picture of Cessna 310K taken at Riyadh - King Khaled International (RUH / OERK), Saudi Arabia by Steve Cos on ABPic
http://luftwaffeas.blogspot.com/2012...rabia.html?m=1
https://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?p=917886
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Softness and lack of contrast would certainly be issues, and perhaps color and yes compression as well.- how do I deal with compression? These setting I used previously for saving in PS. For this photo, I had unchecked progressive too.
- This is an HDR image, so I thought, dealing with contrast shouldn't be an issue, all the data is there you just have to adjust the curves, isn't it?
- Softness can be fixed by sharpness the aircraft a lit bit more?
Comment
- how do I deal with compression? These setting I used previously for saving in PS. For this photo, I had unchecked progressive too.
-
Originally posted by yousaf View Post[LIST][*]how do I deal with compression? These setting I used previously for saving in PS. For this photo, I had unchecked progressive too.
Originally posted by yousaf View PostThis is an HDR image, so I thought, dealing with contrast shouldn't be an issue, all the data is there you just have to adjust the curves, isn't it?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by yousaf View PostQUOTE=dlowwa;n1089181]
That image is much too small to be able to tell you anything.
Don't do HDR. Not only is it actually not allowed, but usually ends up with a contrast/processing rejection.
[/QUOTE]
Don't see anything specific in the settings that would cause concern, though the output file size is a bit smaller (198k) than I would expect for a 1200pix image. Not sure if that's because the 'save for web' function compresses it more than normal save function does, but in any case, maybe try just the latter and see if the size is any larger?
In any case, 'compression' as a rejection reason has other causes not related to save settings, so best if you provide an example of where you're seeing the problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
In any case, 'compression' as a rejection reason has other causes not related to save settings, so best if you provide an example of where you're seeing the problem.[/QUOTE]
Same photo.
I tried saving using normal save as, but there was an issue with white balance.
This is version, I uploaded and which was rejected here https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8108525
This is with save as, no other settings were changed. Only this was saved at 1200px
Comment
-
-
-
Comment