Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Yousaf Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    No issue with Serene 737?
    See:

    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes, borderline contrast and overprocessed.
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    Contrast is fine, this halo you are talking about?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Some kind of dark halo around the aircraft, but can't say for certain it would cause a rejection.
    No issue with Serene 737?
    Contrast is fine, this halo you are talking about?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-08-06 091031.png
Views:	33
Size:	186.5 KB
ID:	1095971
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-08-06 090901.png
Views:	39
Size:	125.8 KB
ID:	1095970

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post

    Is there any issue with 737?
    I have used old method for 767 now
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9100-Edit-2-A9C-DHJ-1200 x 675.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	477.0 KB
ID:	1095887
    Some kind of dark halo around the aircraft, but can't say for certain it would cause a rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes, borderline contrast and overprocessed. Definitely your bad editing causing the latter; look at how the sky is one color in that small space on the main gear, and another color for the rest of the frame. Bad processing bordering on manipulation.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_33838.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	449.2 KB
ID:	1095806
    Is there any issue with 737?
    I have used old method for 767 now
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9100-Edit-2-A9C-DHJ-1200 x 675.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	477.0 KB
ID:	1095887

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    Changed location..any issues?
    Yes, borderline contrast and overprocessed. Definitely your bad editing causing the latter; look at how the sky is one color in that small space on the main gear, and another color for the rest of the frame. Bad processing bordering on manipulation.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_33838.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	449.2 KB
ID:	1095806

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Changed location. First Serene air. Any issues? Contrast, sharpness etc?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9079-Edit-A9P-BNB-1200 x 800.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	539.7 KB
ID:	1095791

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9100-Edit-A9C-DHJ-1200 x 675.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	437.1 KB
ID:	1095792
    Same location. any issues?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post

    Contrast isn't enough on the aircraft?
    Correct. Hazy light due to high cloud/smog.

    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    Overprocessing, I couldn't find a definition for it? what exactly it meant by overprocessing?
    Editing halos.

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Sharpness no. Contrast yes. Overprocessing and insects also yes.
    Contrast isn't enough on the aircraft? Overprocessing, I couldn't find a definition for it? what exactly it meant by overprocessing?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-07-24 081541.png
Views:	59
Size:	129.4 KB
ID:	1095227

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    Rare early morning PIA 777-200. Any issue with contrast or Sharpness? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8652-Edit-AP-BGK-1200 x 800.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	484.5 KB
ID:	1095155
    Sharpness no. Contrast yes. Overprocessing and insects also yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Rare early morning PIA 777-200. Any issue with contrast or Sharpness? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8652-Edit-AP-BGK-1200 x 800.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	484.5 KB
ID:	1095155

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    Sensor and lens were recently cleaned.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-07-20 163915.png
Views:	81
Size:	170.0 KB
ID:	1094903Before the crop.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-07-20 164335.png
Views:	77
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	1094904After the crop.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8199-Edit-A9C-FC-1200 x 800-3.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	302.6 KB
ID:	1094905
    Don't see any dust that would be an issue, thought could have issues with exposure and contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Sensor and lens were recently cleaned.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-07-20 163915.png
Views:	81
Size:	170.0 KB
ID:	1094903Before the crop.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-07-20 164335.png
Views:	77
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	1094904After the crop.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8199-Edit-A9C-FC-1200 x 800-3.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	302.6 KB
ID:	1094905

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    A9C-FC captured again. Any issue with Contrast, sharpness? Again early morning, with the sun still rising from the horizon. Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_8199-Edit-A9C-FC-1200 x 800-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	318.6 KB ID:	1094861
    A little bit high in frame. Always check for dust spots on this kind of shots, and remember to select Special Scheme category

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    A9C-FC captured again. Any issue with Contrast, sharpness? Again early morning, with the sun still rising from the horizon. Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8199-Edit-A9C-FC-1200 x 800-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	318.6 KB ID:	1094861

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by yousaf View Post

    Sorry for not being specific. This photo. Genere will be military? Category Warbird/vintage ?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8300.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	598.2 KB
ID:	1094380
    If operated by an air force, then yes military. Warbird/Vintage also applies as is seems to be preserved.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X