Yousaf Editing Advice

[yousaf]

Without more information on the frame, I couldn't tell you.

There was issue with height of the frame, I had to re-edit to a larger size. Now, this is 1200 x 675frame.

[dlowwa]

There was issue with height of the frame, I had to re-edit to a larger size. Now, this is 1200 x 675frame.

Frame = aircraft, i.e. serial/cn/reg/bu. number, etc..

[yousaf]

Frame = aircraft, i.e. serial/cn/reg/bu. number, etc..

Couldn't find its Serial number.
The sources I have found are

Registration: 131

Construction Number: Unknown

Model Cessna 310K

Operator: Saqr al-Jazira Aviation Museum

https://abpic.co.uk/pictures/view/1344734

The twin-engined six-seats Cessna 310K reg. 131, operated by RSAF.

http://luftwaffeas.blogspot.com/2012...rabia.html?m=1

131 Cessna 310K

https://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?p=917886

[dlowwa]

Couldn't find its Serial number.
The sources I have found are

https://abpic.co.uk/pictures/view/1344734

http://luftwaffeas.blogspot.com/2012...rabia.html?m=1

https://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?p=917886

Scramble is reliable, use 131 as the registration and Cessna 310K as type.

[yousaf]

Is there any issue with this file? Any issue with Jpg artefacts, sharpness or contrast?

[dlowwa]

Is there any issue with this file? Any issue with Jpg artefacts, sharpness or contrast?

Softness and lack of contrast would certainly be issues, and perhaps color and yes compression as well.

[yousaf]

Softness and lack of contrast would certainly be issues, and perhaps color and yes compression as well.

• how do I deal with compression? These setting I used previously for saving in PS. For this photo, I had unchecked progressive too.
• This is an HDR image, so I thought, dealing with contrast shouldn't be an issue, all the data is there you just have to adjust the curves, isn't it?
• Softness can be fixed by sharpness the aircraft a lit bit more?

[dlowwa]

[LIST][*]how do I deal with compression? These setting I used previously for saving in PS. For this photo, I had unchecked progressive too.

That image is much too small to be able to tell you anything.

This is an HDR image, so I thought, dealing with contrast shouldn't be an issue, all the data is there you just have to adjust the curves, isn't it?

Don't do HDR. Not only is it actually not allowed, but usually ends up with a contrast/processing rejection.

[yousaf]

QUOTE=dlowwa;n1089181]

That image is much too small to be able to tell you anything.




Don't do HDR. Not only is it actually not allowed, but usually ends up with a contrast/processing rejection.[/QUOTE]

There was an issue with the upload, had to use a third party service. Hopefully, it is clear now.

[dlowwa]

QUOTE=dlowwa;n1089181]

That image is much too small to be able to tell you anything.




Don't do HDR. Not only is it actually not allowed, but usually ends up with a contrast/processing rejection.

There was an issue with the upload, had to use a third party service. Hopefully, it is clear now.
[/QUOTE]

Don't see anything specific in the settings that would cause concern, though the output file size is a bit smaller (198k) than I would expect for a 1200pix image. Not sure if that's because the 'save for web' function compresses it more than normal save function does, but in any case, maybe try just the latter and see if the size is any larger?

In any case, 'compression' as a rejection reason has other causes not related to save settings, so best if you provide an example of where you're seeing the problem.

[yousaf]

There was an issue with the upload, had to use a third party service. Hopefully, it is clear now.

Don't see anything specific in the settings that would cause concern, though the output file size is a bit smaller (198k) than I would expect for a 1200pix image. Not sure if that's because the 'save for web' function compresses it more than normal save function does, but in any case, maybe try just the latter and see if the size is any larger?

In any case, 'compression' as a rejection reason has other causes not related to save settings, so best if you provide an example of where you're seeing the problem.[/QUOTE]

Same photo.
I tried saving using normal save as, but there was an issue with white balance.

This is version, I uploaded and which was rejected here https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8108525


This is with save as, no other settings were changed. Only this was saved at 1200px

[dlowwa]

Same photo.
I tried saving using normal save as, but there was an issue with white balance.

The compression effect is visible on both. In that case, probably related to your processing rather than save settings.

[yousaf]

The compression effect is visible on both. In that case, probably related to your processing rather than save settings.

Can you point out the areas which have compression effects? I didn't do anything out of ordinary with these images.

[dlowwa]

Can you point out the areas which have compression effects? I didn't do anything out of ordinary with these images.

Sky is blocky/blotchy. Usually the effect of processing (noise reduction, etc..)

[yousaf]

Sky is blocky/blotchy. Usually the effect of processing (noise reduction, etc..)

Shot at ISO100, noise reduction done with Dfine2, which was obviously minimum.