Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lat1918-Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    I recently had a photograph rejected due to being backlit and contrast issues. I did appeal and get told the lighting is terrible and I was alright with the issue of contrast but I was scratching my head on lighting since I have had pictures in similar lighting accepted and such. I was wondering what I can do and to understand these things.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6782290
    Thank you in advance,
    Richard
    I don't see any images of yours accepted with similarly poor lighting. There is no direct light on the aircraft yet a bright background in your rejected image. This is always a recipe for a contrast rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    I recently had a photograph rejected due to being backlit and contrast issues. I did appeal and get told the lighting is terrible and I was alright with the issue of contrast but I was scratching my head on lighting since I have had pictures in similar lighting accepted and such. I was wondering what I can do and to understand these things.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6782290
    Thank you in advance,
    Richard

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    Hello,
    I have had a few pictures rejected due to Vignetting and I went back over them and fixed them. But again I got it rejected due to the same reason. I am scratching my head to see where it is showing up since I can't see it myself.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6752028
    Thank you,
    Richard
    Top corners are much darker than the rest of the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    Hello,
    I have had a few pictures rejected due to Vignetting and I went back over them and fixed them. But again I got it rejected due to the same reason. I am scratching my head to see where it is showing up since I can't see it myself.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6752028
    Thank you,
    Richard
    Richard,

    There are strong vignettings in the corners, probably because you are shooting in f5.6 or less. How you tried to correct the issue this time?

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Hello,
    I have had a few pictures rejected due to Vignetting and I went back over them and fixed them. But again I got it rejected due to the same reason. I am scratching my head to see where it is showing up since I can't see it myself.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6752028
    Thank you,
    Richard

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    You can mark it as hot. The system sometimes doesn't recognize new military regs. as hot, since they are of no use to FR24.
    Thank you for the help and quick response!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    Was wondering if I uploaded a military aircraft that is first registration is considered 'hot'? I had uploaded a photograph of a military aircraft that was a first registration and had it wait in the queue. Just was wondering if it would need to be marked as hot or just let it sit in the queue.
    Thank you in advance
    You can mark it as hot. The system sometimes doesn't recognize new military regs. as hot, since they are of no use to FR24.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Was wondering if I uploaded a military aircraft that is first registration is considered 'hot'? I had uploaded a photograph of a military aircraft that was a first registration and had it wait in the queue. Just was wondering if it would need to be marked as hot or just let it sit in the queue.
    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16250[/ATTACH]
    Was wondering if this would be considered cut off?
    Thank you in advance
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0116-N385HA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	806.0 KB
ID:	1028386
    Was wondering if this would be considered cut off?
    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    First three borderline, so I could see them going either way. Last one I don't think so, but it's up to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Was wondering if these would be worth an appeal?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6568334
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6568328
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6568321
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6568341
    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    Was wanting clarification for how the picture is over processed.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6530182
    Thank you in advance
    Editing halos around wing & tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Was wanting clarification for how the picture is over processed.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6530182
    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    It's a new airframe, so yes hot.
    Thank you for helping me!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X