If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Not sure if this is fixable due to the very bright background. I think, this in addition with the sunless fuselage leads mostly to a "too little contrast" rejection.
Ricky, how on earth do you expect us to help with such a ranting like yours ...
The most important part in photography is location and light. You decided to take photos on an overcast day, that is your choice and there is nothing wrong with it. But the photos will lack light, colours and contrast. If you want better photos, wait for a sunny day with more blue sky. That's what the screener replied to you.
Would like to apologize for the former post. I was a little bit over stressed, did not mean to cause any issues that would make me look bad. Sorry again
I was just wondering if I could get the pictures I had posted in the previous post before screened? I understand that some people are busy. Thank you
I'll try one more time with you. The problem is not the rant you posted, it was the fact that despite me telling you the image(s) were correctly rejected, you went and appealed anyway. That is something completely within your rights, but then I have no incentive to offer advice if it's simply going to be ignored. If you choose to ignore the advice given, that's completely your decision, but then don't be surprised if you stop receiving advice.
1. ok
2-3 probably ok, though the crop is very close on the nose
4. contrast
I'll try one more time with you. The problem is not the rant you posted, it was the fact that despite me telling you the image(s) were correctly rejected, you went and appealed anyway. That is something completely within your rights, but then I have no incentive to offer advice if it's simply going to be ignored. If you choose to ignore the advice given, that's completely your decision, but then don't be surprised if you stop receiving advice.
1. ok
2-3 probably ok, though the crop is very close on the nose
4. contrast
With two and three I feel like the centering is a bit too low, should I go back and fix that as well? Thank you dlowwa
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13468[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13469[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13470[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13471[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13472[/ATTACH]
Was hoping to have these prescreened. Thank you again
1) maybe a tad soft, and that distraction on the left, not a rejection reason but kinda ruins the shot
2) borderline cut-off for some screeners maybe but I would vote add
3) bordeline contrast
4) contrast, difference between sky and plane almost not visible
5) should be ok
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13500[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13501[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13502[/ATTACH]
Prescreen please. Thank you again
All would be rejected for soft and overprocessed (editing halos), and the first possibly for manipulation as well for whatever you did to the sky above the tail.
All would be rejected for soft and overprocessed (editing halos), and the first possibly for manipulation as well for whatever you did to the sky above the tail.
The first one I've been having issues with when submitting. Either overexposed, dust spots, or soft. That's probably what you noticed in the first one. I certainly have been having a difficult time with that one. Thank you for your generous help
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment