Lat1918-Editing Advice

[Lat1918]

How about now? I boosted the sharpening a bit and fixed that halo issue

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13504[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13505[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13506[/ATTACH]
How about now? I boosted the sharpening a bit and fixed that halo issue

Would be rejected for:

1. overprocessed
2. blurry
3. overprocessed

[Lat1918]

Prescreen please. Tried different photos for the previous ones that were getting issues. Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13558[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13559[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13560[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13561[/ATTACH]
Prescreen please. Tried different photos for the previous ones that were getting issues. Thank you in advance

1. soft/blurry, overprocessed
2. borderline soft
3-4 soft

[Lat1918]

1. soft/blurry, overprocessed
2. borderline soft
3-4 soft

Was wondering how #1 is soft/blurry, overprocessed and how #4 is soft. Just wanting to know where exactly the errors are and what I can do or if I should just move on. Thank you

[Julian S.]

Was wondering how #1 is soft/blurry, overprocessed and how #4 is soft. Just wanting to know where exactly the errors are and what I can do or if I should just move on. Thank you

Hey Ricky

Blurryness can not be repaired, unfortunately. (in your Picture the front is blurred).
Overprocessed Pictures (mostly halos) can be repaired sometimes by editing the original file without touching the clarity, depht and light adjustment.
Softness can be fixed (mostly, when it is not that much and if it is not "out of focus") with some sharpening, be careful - not that much but as much as necessary.

Hope this helps, have a nice evening!

[Lat1918]

Was hoping to get these prescreened please. Thank you

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13598[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13599[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13600[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]13601[/ATTACH]
Was hoping to get these prescreened please. Thank you

1. ok
2. dirty, borderline cut off (tight crop)
3. overprocessed (editing halos)
4. ok

[Lat1918]

1. ok
2. dirty, borderline cut off (tight crop)
3. overprocessed (editing halos)
4. ok

In reference to number two, I cannot find any dust spots or anything in particular which would mean its dirty. Just was wondering where it was so I could go back and edit it correctly

[dlowwa]

In reference to number two, I cannot find any dust spots or anything in particular which would mean its dirty. Just was wondering where it was so I could go back and edit it correctly

[Lat1918]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13637[/ATTACH]

Oh ok! With my eyes they usually don’t catch everything. Thank you for helping me find it!

[Lat1918]

Ok, I reworked the picture and hopefully got rid of that pesky dust bunny. I did two different ones and was wondering which one is best. Thank you

[DJReed]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]13645[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]13646[/ATTACH]
Ok, I reworked the picture and hopefully got rid of that pesky dust bunny. I did two different ones and was wondering which one is best. Thank you

Both look the same, both look soft. You may want to sharpen them a bit. Also this would be a night shot when you upload for screening.

DJ Reed / Screening Team

[Lat1918]

Thank you for letting me know about the softness as well

[Lat1918]

How about now? Used a different shot without the dust bunny in it. Still too soft or passable?