Lat1918-Editing Advice

[LX-A343]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14873[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14874[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14875[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14876[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14877[/ATTACH]
Was hoping to get these prescreened. Thank you in advance

I can't really comment on the quality of the photos, as these are not the photos you will be able to upload.

However, 2-3 are backlit, which simply can't be fixed. 1, 4 and 5 need a tad more brightening.

[Lat1918]

Was hoping to see if this photo was worth appealing. I don't want to be going in the dark with this one and just was hoping to see if it was worth it.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6495884
Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

Was hoping to see if this photo was worth appealing. I don't want to be going in the dark with this one and just was hoping to see if it was worth it.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6495884
Thank you in advance

Can't quite tell if it's backlit, but I would have rejected it for contrast as well.

[Lat1918]

Can't quite tell if it's backlit, but I would have rejected it for contrast as well.

Is it too light or too dark? I also was scratching my head on the backlit issue.

[dlowwa]

Is it too light or too dark? I also was scratching my head on the backlit issue.

Too much of the aircraft is in shadow (i.e. nearly backlit). Given the angle of the light, not sure there is much you can do to improve it.

[Lat1918]

I am wondering if these are worth an appeal. The Korean Air I am quite certain that the bad color rejection is wrong. The China Eastern I'm trying to figure out how it is soft.
Thank you in advance
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6505540
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6505500

[dlowwa]

I am wondering if these are worth an appeal. The Korean Air I am quite certain that the bad color rejection is wrong. The China Eastern I'm trying to figure out how it is soft.
Thank you in advance
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6505540
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6505500

KE is borderline oversaturated. MU same, borderline soft. Appeals would have maybe a 50% chance I think.

[Lat1918]

Was wondering if this was worth an appeal or just re-edit to make acceptable?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6513960
Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

Was wondering if this was worth an appeal or just re-edit to make acceptable?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6513960
Thank you in advance

Borderline, but could use a little more contrast I suppose.

[Lat1918]

I have a question on a registration of an aircraft. I noticed that there was another aircraft with a similar registration but it is not the same aircraft. Would this be considered a "Hot photo"? Just wondering for clarification before uploading.
Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

I have a question on a registration of an aircraft. I noticed that there was another aircraft with a similar registration but it is not the same aircraft. Would this be considered a "Hot photo"? Just wondering for clarification before uploading.
Thank you in advance

You'd need to supply more specifics before we can comment on that.

[Lat1918]

For this one. The registration was previously on a Gulfstream and is now being used for this Cessna 680.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/412723
Above is the Gulfstream with the same registration.

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15377[/ATTACH]
For this one. The registration was previously on a Gulfstream and is now being used for this Cessna 680.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/412723
Above is the Gulfstream with the same registration.

It's a new airframe, so yes hot.

[Lat1918]

It's a new airframe, so yes hot.

Thank you for helping me!

[Lat1918]

Was wanting clarification for how the picture is over processed.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6530182
Thank you in advance