Lat1918-Editing Advice

[Lat1918]

Was hoping to get these pre-screened. Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

Was wondering whether this would be considered a business jet since I'm unsure.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21627[/ATTACH]
Thank you

Yes.

[Lat1918]

Was wondering whether this would be considered a business jet since I'm unsure.

Thank you

[Alex - Spot-This !]

It's not a change of scheme - For such little change, there's no real reason not to wait 6 days to get your pic screened in the normal queue.

Regards
Alex

[Lat1918]

I had this photograph rejected for invalid hot, when I read the reason in the email sent I noticed that the reason did not match what I had written in the Hot Photo section. When I had put it as "Hot" I had specified that it was for the new winglet type added to the aircraft, but in the rejection reason they said it was for livery. Would it be worth it to appeal or just upload again?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7099615

Thank you in advance,
Richard

[dlowwa]

Let me rephrase my question. What building should I be using as a reference?

--->

Judging by the verticals

Specifically, the verticals towards the center of the frame.

[Lat1918]

Let me rephrase my question. What building should I be using as a reference?

[dlowwa]

I have a question on this recent rejection. I am wondering what I should use as a reference for fixing the horizon since there's quite a bit going on in the shot.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7065893

Thank you in advance,
Richard

Judging by the verticals, needs a touch of CW.

[Lat1918]

I have a question on this recent rejection. I am wondering what I should use as a reference for fixing the horizon since there's quite a bit going on in the shot.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7065893

Thank you in advance,
Richard

[Lat1918]

Dlowwa,
I am suspecting a system bug myself. It's alright, just thought I'd let it be known that it happened in-case it happens again. Thank you for the help

[dlowwa]

dlowwa,
It is correct, just seems it got deleted without me doing it on my end. I know for sure I did not remove it.

Can't really tell you then; perhaps it was a system bug. If it had been deleted (rejected) by the crew, there would have been a record.

[Lat1918]

dlowwa,
It is correct, just seems it got deleted without me doing it on my end. I know for sure I did not remove it.

[dlowwa]

I had a photograph in the queue but when I went to see if it got screened it seems it was not and there is no record of it. I know that I did not delete it from the queue and I do have a ID # for it since I find it interesting that it seems to have just vanished into thin air. The ID is: Queue ID: 6800866
Thank you,
Richard

I see only a 6800867. Are you sure the id# is correct, or that it wasn't added?

[Lat1918]

I had a photograph in the queue but when I went to see if it got screened it seems it was not and there is no record of it. I know that I did not delete it from the queue and I do have a ID # for it since I find it interesting that it seems to have just vanished into thin air. The ID is: Queue ID: 6800866
Thank you,
Richard

[Lat1918]

I had a photograph rejected due to bad color and I was wondering whether it would be worth it to appeal since I am surprised a few pictures taken at the same area were accepted which obviously were bad color. I am just surprised at the fact the others were accepted and what I should do to fix my own.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6786377

The ones which got accepted:

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8900526

Thanks in advance,
Richard