DirtyCrow - editing Advice

[dlowwa]

Do you think this one can make it?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15213[/ATTACH]

Or better this one in sunshine, but with less resolution?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15214[/ATTACH]

Thank you.

First would be a contrast rejection; second has some light halos visible, but might be acceptable.

[DirtyCrow]

I have received an rejection for bad proceessing again. This time i can not see any halos or anything like that.
The only thing i did, was to increase the saturation by 5 and set the color temperature from 5300 to 5600.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6523918

[dlowwa]

I have received an rejection for bad proceessing again. This time i can not see any halos or anything like that.
The only thing i did, was to increase the saturation by 5 and set the color temperature from 5300 to 5600.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6523918

Dark editing halo indeed visible along the top of the fuselage.

[DirtyCrow]

Ok, i will try to edit it out, thanks

[dlowwa]

Ok, i will try to edit it out, thanks

Don't think you can 'edit it out'; better to simply avoid it in the first place.

[DirtyCrow]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6539353

Can someone have a look on this one please?
I checked in LR the verticals of the bulding in the left background, the vertical edges of the white signs in the middle background and the vertical edges of the building in the right background. All look level to me.

[wkd001]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6539353

Can someone have a look on this one please?
I checked in LR the verticals of the bulding in the left background, the vertical edges of the white signs in the middle background and the vertical edges of the building in the right background. All look level to me.

HI

, not a screener, but It seems it needs al small touch of CW as the photo seems to be leaning to the left.

But the screener could have another idea.

Best regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6539353

Can someone have a look on this one please?
I checked in LR the verticals of the bulding in the left background, the vertical edges of the white signs in the middle background and the vertical edges of the building in the right background. All look level to me.

Verticals leaning left = needs CW rotation.

[DirtyCrow]

I wonder if these pics are ok. It was a bit difficult to level them, as the fence at the bottom belongs to a downgoing road, so i used some churches in the background to level it.




Thank you

[vcruvinel]

I wonder if these pics are ok. It was a bit difficult to level them, as the fence at the bottom belongs to a downgoing road, so i used some churches in the background to level it.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16537[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16538[/ATTACH]

Thank you

Hi,

IMHO both looks ok about the level.

Cheers,

Vinicius

[Julian S.]

Hi,

IMHO both looks ok about the level.

Cheers,

Vinicius

Hi

Nothing to add, both are OK for me (leveling and quality).
Don´t forget to tick "Special Scheme".

Have a nice day.

[DirtyCrow]

Now i got the Malayisa above rejected for Horizon, all other Pictures from the same Location are accepted. Should i appeal?

[dlowwa]

Now i got the Malayisa above rejected for Horizon, all other Pictures from the same Location are accepted. Should i appeal?

Don't think so, verticals are leaning a bit.

[DirtyCrow]

I have leveled it on the lampposts behnid the fence instead of the churches, better now?

[olandes269]

I have leveled it on the lampposts behnid the fence instead of the churches, better now?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16704[/ATTACH]

Hello,

I think Dana wants you to put the foreground post vertically. Currently they are leaning to the left. straighten them to the right by 1.91 °

Regards

Olivier