Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DirtyCrow - editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    This would make no sense at all, the posts belong to a downgoing road and are not vertical.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
      This would make no sense at all, the posts belong to a downgoing road and are not vertical.
      That may be, but there is no way to tell that from this image; even more important is the fact that the treeline/actual horizon is sloped to the left, meaning CW rotation is indeed needed.

      Comment


      • #63
        After a long time i need some help again.
        Yesterday i got a few pictures rejected in a row for bad color, but i can´t see the problem. I did absolutely nothing different to these pics and many others of the same day with same specs were accepted.
        Hope somebody can help me out on these.
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969187
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969183
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969133

        Thank you

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
          After a long time i need some help again.
          Yesterday i got a few pictures rejected in a row for bad color, but i can´t see the problem. I did absolutely nothing different to these pics and many others of the same day with same specs were accepted.
          Hope somebody can help me out on these.
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969187
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969183
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969133

          Thank you
          Cyan/blue cast on all of those. Accepted ones have it too, though not quite as bad.

          Comment


          • #65
            Thank you, i will try to color correct it.

            Comment


            • #66
              Unfortunately i was not able to avoid the barbed wire completely on this shot.
              Is it ok, as it does not obstruct the view, or would it be better to go for a more narrow crop?
              Click image for larger version

Name:	TOM_0920.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1119121
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
                Unfortunately i was not able to avoid the barbed wire completely on this shot.
                Is it ok, as it does not obstruct the view, or would it be better to go for a more narrow crop?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	TOM_0920.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1119121
                Not technically a rejection because of that, though it is somewhat distracting. Would a 16x9 crop not remove it?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Not technically a rejection because of that, though it is somewhat distracting. Would a 16x9 crop not remove it?
                  Would have to go more narrow than 16:9. The shot itself is not perfect ant quite high.
                  The spot was packed with spotters and only a few shots possible, before the Aircraft was obstructed by something. Stupid situation, but the shot is not repeatable, as this was the last flight of this aircraft in Philippines colors.

                  Thank you for the advice, i´ll go for 16:9 and try to make the best out of it.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post

                    Would have to go more narrow than 16:9. The shot itself is not perfect ant quite high.
                    The spot was packed with spotters and only a few shots possible, before the Aircraft was obstructed by something. Stupid situation, but the shot is not repeatable, as this was the last flight of this aircraft in Philippines colors.

                    Thank you for the advice, i´ll go for 16:9 and try to make the best out of it.
                    It seems to me a 16:9 crop would solve the issue completely, no?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_41434.jpeg
Views:	91
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1119230

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Yep, thank you.
                      Hat a litte brainfart with the ratios. Managed the picture now. Sorry for the inconveniences.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Hey guys, i really need some help now.
                        From my last uploads i got several rejections for "bad processing" in wich i did absolutely the same as i did in my other photos. No filters, no weird stuff, just setting the contrast and stamping the dust spots. Otherwise those photos are out of camera.
                        Hope you can tell me, what´s the problem here.

                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038159
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038138
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038128
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015220
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015211
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015207

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Hi

                          Ich bin kein Screener und ebenfalls noch in einem Lernprozess auf JP,aber alle Rejections sind mit dem Check for Dust Tool nachvollziehbar
                          1. Vignettierung ( Objektivkorrektur!)
                          2. Evtl wegen den Halos um den Flieger, auf Höhe der Triebwerke gut zu sehen
                          3. Siehe 2
                          4. Wie angegeben - Vignettierung
                          5. Vignettierung und Halos
                          6. Halos
                          Mfg
                          und vielleicht trifft man sich mal in FRA

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Ich raffs halt grad nicht, weil ich über 1000 Fotos mit exakt dieser Kamera, diesem Objektiv und dieser Art der Bearbeitung akzeptiert bekommen hab. Nur bei diesem einen Set aus FRA plötzlich bad processing, was ich sonst noch nie hatte...
                            Naja, man kann drauf verzichten, demnächst gibts wieder Bilder mit Boden drauf, dann muss man auch nicht die Regler so rumreißen.
                            Danke jedenfalls.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Vielleicht meldet sich Dana hier noch und kann mehr dazu sagen.
                              Ich denk das alle fixbar sein könnten.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
                                Hey guys, i really need some help now.
                                From my last uploads i got several rejections for "bad processing" in wich i did absolutely the same as i did in my other photos. No filters, no weird stuff, just setting the contrast and stamping the dust spots. Otherwise those photos are out of camera.
                                Hope you can tell me, what´s the problem here.

                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038159
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038138
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038128
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015220
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015211
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015207
                                Bright circular banding in all of those. Looks like poor vignetting correction.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X