DirtyCrow - editing Advice

[DirtyCrow]

This would make no sense at all, the posts belong to a downgoing road and are not vertical.

[dlowwa]

This would make no sense at all, the posts belong to a downgoing road and are not vertical.

That may be, but there is no way to tell that from this image; even more important is the fact that the treeline/actual horizon is sloped to the left, meaning CW rotation is indeed needed.

[DirtyCrow]

After a long time i need some help again.
Yesterday i got a few pictures rejected in a row for bad color, but i can´t see the problem. I did absolutely nothing different to these pics and many others of the same day with same specs were accepted.
Hope somebody can help me out on these.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969187
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969183
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969133

Thank you

[dlowwa]

After a long time i need some help again.
Yesterday i got a few pictures rejected in a row for bad color, but i can´t see the problem. I did absolutely nothing different to these pics and many others of the same day with same specs were accepted.
Hope somebody can help me out on these.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969187
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969183
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8969133

Thank you

Cyan/blue cast on all of those. Accepted ones have it too, though not quite as bad.

[DirtyCrow]

Thank you, i will try to color correct it.

[DirtyCrow]

Unfortunately i was not able to avoid the barbed wire completely on this shot.
Is it ok, as it does not obstruct the view, or would it be better to go for a more narrow crop?

[dlowwa]

Unfortunately i was not able to avoid the barbed wire completely on this shot.
Is it ok, as it does not obstruct the view, or would it be better to go for a more narrow crop?

Not technically a rejection because of that, though it is somewhat distracting. Would a 16x9 crop not remove it?

[DirtyCrow]

Not technically a rejection because of that, though it is somewhat distracting. Would a 16x9 crop not remove it?

Would have to go more narrow than 16:9. The shot itself is not perfect ant quite high.
The spot was packed with spotters and only a few shots possible, before the Aircraft was obstructed by something. Stupid situation, but the shot is not repeatable, as this was the last flight of this aircraft in Philippines colors.

Thank you for the advice, i´ll go for 16:9 and try to make the best out of it.

[dlowwa]

Would have to go more narrow than 16:9. The shot itself is not perfect ant quite high.
The spot was packed with spotters and only a few shots possible, before the Aircraft was obstructed by something. Stupid situation, but the shot is not repeatable, as this was the last flight of this aircraft in Philippines colors.

Thank you for the advice, i´ll go for 16:9 and try to make the best out of it.

It seems to me a 16:9 crop would solve the issue completely, no?

[DirtyCrow]

Yep, thank you.
Hat a litte brainfart with the ratios. Managed the picture now. Sorry for the inconveniences.

[DirtyCrow]

Hey guys, i really need some help now.
From my last uploads i got several rejections for "bad processing" in wich i did absolutely the same as i did in my other photos. No filters, no weird stuff, just setting the contrast and stamping the dust spots. Otherwise those photos are out of camera.
Hope you can tell me, what´s the problem here.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038159
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038138
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038128
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015220
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015211
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015207

[Sven_EDDN]

Hi

Ich bin kein Screener und ebenfalls noch in einem Lernprozess auf JP,aber alle Rejections sind mit dem Check for Dust Tool nachvollziehbar

1. Vignettierung ( Objektivkorrektur!)
2. Evtl wegen den Halos um den Flieger, auf Höhe der Triebwerke gut zu sehen
3. Siehe 2
4. Wie angegeben - Vignettierung
5. Vignettierung und Halos
6. Halos

Mfg
und vielleicht trifft man sich mal in FRA

[DirtyCrow]

Ich raffs halt grad nicht, weil ich über 1000 Fotos mit exakt dieser Kamera, diesem Objektiv und dieser Art der Bearbeitung akzeptiert bekommen hab. Nur bei diesem einen Set aus FRA plötzlich bad processing, was ich sonst noch nie hatte...
Naja, man kann drauf verzichten, demnächst gibts wieder Bilder mit Boden drauf, dann muss man auch nicht die Regler so rumreißen.
Danke jedenfalls.

[Sven_EDDN]

Vielleicht meldet sich Dana hier noch und kann mehr dazu sagen.
Ich denk das alle fixbar sein könnten.

[dlowwa]

Hey guys, i really need some help now.
From my last uploads i got several rejections for "bad processing" in wich i did absolutely the same as i did in my other photos. No filters, no weird stuff, just setting the contrast and stamping the dust spots. Otherwise those photos are out of camera.
Hope you can tell me, what´s the problem here.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038159
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038138
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038128
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015220
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015211
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015207

Bright circular banding in all of those. Looks like poor vignetting correction.