Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DirtyCrow - editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    Yesterday i did my first nightshots and i am not sure if i got the settings right.
    How do they look like to you?
    1. centering
    2. horizon, centering
    3. borderline centering

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Yesterday i did my first nightshots and i am not sure if i got the settings right.
    How do they look like to you?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TOM_5778.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	486.0 KB
ID:	1149156Click image for larger version

Name:	TOM_5787.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	840.3 KB
ID:	1149157Click image for larger version

Name:	TOM_5822.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	893.8 KB
ID:	1149158

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    This was f8, which i use ever since. That´s what confuses me so much with this issues. I did nothing different to what i did since years.
    I will try f10 tomorrow, to find out if this is the problem or something else.
    f/settings are not causing the halos. The circular halos are from vignetting (over)correction in your software/editing (Adobe Lightroom as you mentioned).

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    This was f8, which i use ever since. That´s what confuses me so much with this issues. I did nothing different to what i did since years.
    I will try f10 tomorrow, to find out if this is the problem or something else.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    What should i use instead to minimize the vignetting?
    Stopping down the aperture when shooting should help.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    What should i use instead to minimize the vignetting?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    Ok. Thing is, it´s Adobe Lightroom´s lens correction, which i use since i have started to upload on jetphotos. It´s also the same camera and lens i use for years without any problems and now there are that many issues with these halos.
    I can´t really see, how to fix this properly. Any ideas?
    Don't use Adobe Lightroom´s lens correction

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Ok. Thing is, it´s Adobe Lightroom´s lens correction, which i use since i have started to upload on jetphotos. It´s also the same camera and lens i use for years without any problems and now there are that many issues with these halos.
    I can´t really see, how to fix this properly. Any ideas?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    Hey guys, i really need some help now.
    From my last uploads i got several rejections for "bad processing" in wich i did absolutely the same as i did in my other photos. No filters, no weird stuff, just setting the contrast and stamping the dust spots. Otherwise those photos are out of camera.
    Hope you can tell me, what´s the problem here.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038159
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038138
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038128
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015220
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015211
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015207
    Bright circular banding in all of those. Looks like poor vignetting correction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sven_EDDN
    replied
    Vielleicht meldet sich Dana hier noch und kann mehr dazu sagen.
    Ich denk das alle fixbar sein könnten.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Ich raffs halt grad nicht, weil ich über 1000 Fotos mit exakt dieser Kamera, diesem Objektiv und dieser Art der Bearbeitung akzeptiert bekommen hab. Nur bei diesem einen Set aus FRA plötzlich bad processing, was ich sonst noch nie hatte...
    Naja, man kann drauf verzichten, demnächst gibts wieder Bilder mit Boden drauf, dann muss man auch nicht die Regler so rumreißen.
    Danke jedenfalls.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sven_EDDN
    replied
    Hi

    Ich bin kein Screener und ebenfalls noch in einem Lernprozess auf JP,aber alle Rejections sind mit dem Check for Dust Tool nachvollziehbar
    1. Vignettierung ( Objektivkorrektur!)
    2. Evtl wegen den Halos um den Flieger, auf Höhe der Triebwerke gut zu sehen
    3. Siehe 2
    4. Wie angegeben - Vignettierung
    5. Vignettierung und Halos
    6. Halos
    Mfg
    und vielleicht trifft man sich mal in FRA

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Hey guys, i really need some help now.
    From my last uploads i got several rejections for "bad processing" in wich i did absolutely the same as i did in my other photos. No filters, no weird stuff, just setting the contrast and stamping the dust spots. Otherwise those photos are out of camera.
    Hope you can tell me, what´s the problem here.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038159
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038138
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10038128
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015220
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015211
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10015207

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Yep, thank you.
    Hat a litte brainfart with the ratios. Managed the picture now. Sorry for the inconveniences.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post

    Would have to go more narrow than 16:9. The shot itself is not perfect ant quite high.
    The spot was packed with spotters and only a few shots possible, before the Aircraft was obstructed by something. Stupid situation, but the shot is not repeatable, as this was the last flight of this aircraft in Philippines colors.

    Thank you for the advice, i´ll go for 16:9 and try to make the best out of it.
    It seems to me a 16:9 crop would solve the issue completely, no?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_41434.jpeg
Views:	91
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1119230

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X