Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dariusang - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dariusang - editing advice

    Hi, I personally this that these photos are wrongly rejection. They were just indicated soft by the rejection which I don't think its the case. Could any screeners and public please review it again? Thanks.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6247431

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6247430

  • #2
    I wasn't one of the screeners who reviewed the images for the record. However, I do agree with my colleagues opinion. Think they could both do with another blast of sharpening and for me, maybe a touch more contrast. Easily fixable in post processing and will make nice additions to the database.

    For future rejections, if you feel it is harsh, you can always use the appeal feature.

    Hope this adds some clarity.
    Best regards,
    Dave

    Saving the World, One Screened Image at a time...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by dariusang View Post
      Hi, I personally this that these photos are wrongly rejection. They were just indicated soft by the rejection which I don't think its the case. Could any screeners and public please review it again? Thanks.

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6247431

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6247430
      They are indeed quite soft. Look at the tail area, especially on the second one which is extremely soft, maybe even blurry.

      Comment

      Working...
      X