Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

scbriml - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • scbriml
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit high, but you might get away with it.
    Well, I might try uploading it then.

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by scbriml View Post
    Hello,

    Can a screener please confirm if the following crop is acceptable (photo is unedited, just cropped)? The plane is technically high in the frame, but I believe the overall composition works. Many thanks.
    A bit high, but you might get away with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Hello,

    Can a screener please confirm if the following crop is acceptable (photo is unedited, just cropped)? The plane is technically high in the frame, but I believe the overall composition works. Many thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SB1_9339.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	392.3 KB
ID:	1148971

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by scbriml View Post
    Hi,

    I had this image rejected for level while I was on holiday. Because of very unreliable internet, I was unable to appeal the rejection in time. But I would like opinions as to whether the image is level or not.

    Here's the whole edited image:
    https://flic.kr/p/2nPe1BG
    Hi, please read here when you get the chance (especially #4)

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    It's been a few years, so I've moved your thread(s) for you, but in the future please post any new requests for advice here

    The verticals in the image indicate the CW rotation is indeed needed. Hope that helps.


    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Hi,

    I had this image rejected for level while I was on holiday. Because of very unreliable internet, I was unable to appeal the rejection in time. But I would like opinions as to whether the image is level or not.

    Here's the whole edited image:
    https://flic.kr/p/2nPe1BG

    Zoomed in with some rulers:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Photoshop_8naeWd9NvC.png
Views:	95
Size:	247.7 KB
ID:	1145941

    Appreciate any thoughts. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Originally posted by Brenden S View Post
    Aircraft with fake registrations I have always put in the last known registration and then explained in the comments why it has the fake registration applied. You will find that some screeners are not aware and will reject for bad info - reg.
    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenden S
    replied
    Aircraft with fake registrations I have always put in the last known registration and then explained in the comments why it has the fake registration applied. You will find that some screeners are not aware and will reject for bad info - reg.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Originally posted by ErwinS View Post
    We try to display the last known original reg. So in case 1 that would do.

    For case 2 the original mil serial is ok if displayed as such.
    Thanks for the help, Erwin.

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    We try to display the last known original reg. So in case 1 that would do.

    For case 2 the original mil serial is ok if displayed as such.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Hi, I hope this is the correct forum for this topic.

    I’m looking for clarification on how photos of preserved planes with fake registrations should be uploaded. Specifically, which registration should be used? There are some subtle differences that make me wonder if there’s a single rule that can be applied?

    Case 1 - plane is displayed with an entirely fictitious registration that it never carried in service.

    Case 2 - planes is displayed with a previous registration (not its last identity). This is most often seen with an ex-military plane which last carried a civil registration, but is displayed in military markings with it’s original (or one of several) military registrations.

    Thanks for any clarification.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    OK thanks, Erwin.

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by scbriml View Post
    Hi, I have a photo of a Fokker E.111 replica taken at the Combat Air Museum. What is the correct way of uploading such in terms of type and categories? Many thanks.
    Hi Steve,

    Upload it as the type it is. Like: https://www.jetphotos.com/aircraft/Fokker%20E.III

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Hi, I have a photo of a Fokker E.111 replica taken at the Combat Air Museum. What is the correct way of uploading such in terms of type and categories? Many thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    OK, I have another one:

    NR77V Gee Bee Z-1

    There are seven shots of this reg/plane in the database, but auto-complete doesn't work and the type is not in the drop-downs for upload.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbriml
    replied
    Thanks for the responses. Cheers.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X