Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Do you have any observations for this photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Italian Air Force Tornado ECR MM7051 LGAD 26-04-23.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	359.7 KB
ID:	1162212

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by Cameron Roberts View Post

    Not a screener, but the crop is very awkward.
    Thanks. What would be better? Plenty of similar framed images around.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Ok, thanks. Would that be the same case with this one?
    A bit better. Would be ok for me, but it is a subjective thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cameron Roberts
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Ok, thanks. Would that be the same case with this one?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Indian Air Force Su-30MKI SB114 LGAD taxi 26-04-23.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	922.4 KB
ID:	1161545
    Not a screener, but the crop is very awkward.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Ok, thanks. Would that be the same case with this one?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Indian Air Force Su-30MKI SB114 LGAD taxi 26-04-23.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	922.4 KB
ID:	1161545

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm trying to work out this rejection since the framing is the same as many other images I've uploaded.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Many thanks for your thoughts.
    Framing on the left side was deemed a little too awkward. Personally, I could see it going either way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm trying to work out this rejection since the framing is the same as many other images I've uploaded.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Many thanks for your thoughts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Ok. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Regarding this rejection, my assumption is that it is because of excessive contrast. What is your observation?
    More like overprocessed/lack of shadows.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Regarding this rejection, my assumption is that it is because of excessive contrast. What is your observation?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP JAL 773 JA732J LHR 27L approach 14-06-18.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	871.3 KB
ID:	1158669

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post


    Hi,

    This rejection came through. I'd expect it to be rejected, if at all, as you mentioned for a minor part of it being backlit. I was surprised to see it was rejected for contrast since I can't see any issues regarding that. Any ideas?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
    Tbh, contrast/backlit rejections are sometimes interchangeable. The light is pretty harsh due to the angle, not sure what you can really do to improve it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline. Technically backlit, but the majority of the aircraft visible is lit so might get a pass.

    Hi,

    This rejection came through. I'd expect it to be rejected, if at all, as you mentioned for a minor part of it being backlit. I was surprised to see it was rejected for contrast since I can't see any issues regarding that. Any ideas?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks. Appreciate your thoughts.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    I recently saw several backlit night images and revisited this old image.

    Before I work on it, is it likely to be accepted?
    For me, no, lighting is too poor. Others may disagree of course, but I don't think the chances would be great.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X