Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm working on this image taken whilst it was raining. The rain is not obvious unless looked into detail giving some halos. I've seen other uploaded images with plenty of halos but I wanted to see whether these were acceptable.



Thanks

There are some halos around the tail and especially wing root, but I don't think they should be too big of an issue.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Could I have your thoughts on these two please.






Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Could I have your thoughts on these two please.






Thanks

1. bit noisy, but the lighting works for me
2. likely a dark/contrast rejection

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks very much. Would this noise reduction be acceptable?

[dlowwa]

Thanks very much. Would this noise reduction be acceptable?

I like it. Can't promise it would escape a dark/contrast rejection, but like I said, would be ok for me.

[Flying.Fonz]

No worries at all and thanks for your insight.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'm looking for some firther guidance on 'Part of aircraft cutoff' after this rejection.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8853888

Prior to uploading it I reviewed the guidelines, other posts and plenty of uploaded images. I saw this image

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10018455

which I really liked so I replicated it.

I can understand the subjectiveness of too much/little contrast but I can't see a clear and obvious difference between the images as both demonstrate a motive. I'm interested to know what it is.

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm looking for some firther guidance on 'Part of aircraft cutoff' after this rejection.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8853888

Prior to uploading it I reviewed the guidelines, other posts and plenty of uploaded images. I saw this image

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10018455

which I really liked so I replicated it.

I can understand the subjectiveness of too much/little contrast but I can't see a clear and obvious difference between the images as both demonstrate a motive. I'm interested to know what it is.

Thanks

Subjective, yes, but at least there was motive for awkward crop on the image you refer to - the special scheme. Your image is too wide to be considered a close up, and if the FI had been a regular aircraft, I would argue it should have been rejected as well.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I had this image rejected for contrast (I think) some time ago and I'm working on it again. I've noticed quit a few contrast rejections on cloudy days recently so wanted to check if this is acceptable.



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I had this image rejected for contrast (I think) some time ago and I'm working on it again. I've noticed quit a few contrast rejections on cloudy days recently so wanted to check if this is acceptable.



Thanks

Very likely to be rejected for contrast/color/oversharpened.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Could I have a check on this one pease.



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Could I have a check on this one pease.



Thanks

Might be a touch dark/soft for some, but would be ok for me.