Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    This was rejected for 'Bad Info' but I can't see what the info is so I don't know what was wrong. Do you know what the issue was?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Thanks


    Change 'viewqueued' to 'viewreject' in the link

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Lehondre Photos View Post



      Change 'viewqueued' to 'viewreject' in the link
      Aha, excellent.Thanks very much.

      Comment


      • Hi,

        I'm working on this image and wondered if it can be published here (blurred activity and obstructions)?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	AF Sample image.jpg
Views:	235
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	1125321

        Thanks

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
          Hi,

          I'm working on this image and wondered if it can be published here (blurred activity and obstructions)?
          Debatable since the obstruction is part of the scene. Would be ok for me, but can't say the same for others.

          Comment


          • Understandable. Would the chocks be a problem too?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
              Understandable. Would the chocks be a problem too?
              Shouldn't be an issue.

              Comment


              • Thanks

                Comment


                • Hi,

                  Would this get rejected for backlit or too much/little contrast?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Swiss A321N HP-JPA LHR sunrise land 27L 21-20-21.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	700.2 KB
ID:	1125983

                  Thanks

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                    Hi,

                    Would this get rejected for backlit or too much/little contrast?


                    Thanks
                    For me the contrast is acceptable, though it is a tad dark. But I think it is too soft.

                    Comment


                    • Thanks Pamela. Much appreciated.

                      Comment


                      • Hi,

                        Is this likely to be rejected for not being centred?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 788 G-ZBJG LHR 27L takeoff hotels 11-10-20.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	1131139

                        Thanks

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                          Hi,

                          Is this likely to be rejected for not being centred?
                          Probably.. I mean, I can see the intention, but the jet wash just isn't visible/striking enough to justify it for here I think.

                          Comment


                          • Thanks

                            Comment


                            • Hi,

                              These were rejected for contrast. I've tried various ideas but wondering if you have any pointers to improve them for upload.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	JP UA 764 N76064 AMS landing sunrise 18-03-22.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	829.8 KB
ID:	1143455Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Columbia Helicopters N189CH Boeing-Vertol 107-II ANC parked 07-06-22.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	1.37 MB
ID:	1143456

                              Thanks

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                                Hi,

                                These were rejected for contrast. I've tried various ideas but wondering if you have any pointers to improve them for upload.
                                First might be fixable as it's just a bit flat, but the second might be more of a challenge due to the sky being nearly blown-out as it is.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X