Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these sunset shots.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-789-sunset-arr-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	408.3 KB
ID:	1032090Click image for larger version

Name:	PK-772-sunset-arr-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	464.1 KB
ID:	1032091Click image for larger version

Name:	SL-A333-sunset-arr-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	354.2 KB
ID:	1032092Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ-A388-sunset-arr-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	311.8 KB
ID:	1032093

    Thanks and Happy New Year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Much appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Many thanks.

    I've reworked them focusing on the halos and over processing. Grateful for feedback on this set.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20738[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20739[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20740[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20741[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20742[/ATTACH]

    Cheers
    1. borderline overprocessed/soft
    2-3 borderline soft
    4. borderline heat haze
    5. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Many thanks.

    I've reworked them focusing on the halos and over processing. Grateful for feedback on this set.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Aegean-321-misty-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	487.6 KB
ID:	1032044Click image for larger version

Name:	MH-329-sunset-app-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	376.8 KB
ID:	1032045Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-772-sunset-landing-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	405.1 KB
ID:	1032046Click image for larger version

Name:	NZ-789-line-up-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,006.5 KB
ID:	1032047Click image for larger version

Name:	KQ-788-birds-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	478.5 KB
ID:	1032048

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20718[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20719[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20720[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20721[/ATTACH]

    Cheers
    1. borderline overprocessed
    2. overprocessed
    3. borderline overprocessed
    4. overprocessed, contrast

    All have editing halos visible to some extent.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Grateful for pre-screening advice on these.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	KQ-788-birds-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	601.0 KB
ID:	1032024Click image for larger version

Name:	Aegean-A321-misty-land-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	567.0 KB
ID:	1032025Click image for larger version

Name:	NZ-789-line-up-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1032026Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ-A388-app-web-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	531.7 KB
ID:	1032027

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • enzocmte
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this rejection:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7017550
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20703[/ATTACH]

    The rejection notes were:

    Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
    Too much or too little contrast


    The subject of this photo was a damp cold soaked fuselage which gave rise to very unusual and interesting lines, colours and shades at sunset. Its had very little if any post processing and mostly by the use of Levels for contrast purposes.

    Cheers.
    contrast too strong. editing halos visible on the tail and fuselage. / rgds

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Flying.Fonz - prescreening request / editing advice

    Hi,

    I'm looking for advice on this rejection:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7017550
    Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ-A388-app-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	595.7 KB
ID:	1032009

    The rejection notes were:

    Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
    Too much or too little contrast


    The subject of this photo was a damp cold soaked fuselage which gave rise to very unusual and interesting lines, colours and shades at sunset. Its had very little if any post processing and mostly by the use of Levels for contrast purposes.

    Cheers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks for the advice and will work on the picture.

    The light was very interesting that day with a lot of orange flashing around and deeper yellows. It made it all very atmospheric with the snow.

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm new to photography and around here so looking for some advice. My photo was rejected as undersharpened (soft) with too much or too little contrast.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6273487

    Any suggestions on hoe to improve are greatly appreciated.

    Cheers
    Doesn't seem to soft to me, but the contrast is unnatural - looks overprocessed actually, like too much clarity or shadow/highlight tool. There's an orange tint as well. The quality looks good enough that a good re-edit should make it acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    started a topic Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

    Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

    Hi,

    I'm new to photography and around here so looking for some advice. My photo was rejected as undersharpened (soft) with too much or too little contrast.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6273487

    Any suggestions on hoe to improve are greatly appreciated.

    Cheers
Working...
X