Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I had this rejection.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10866100

I have several thoughts but I wanted to ask for your observations.

Thanks

Maybe a slight red tint, but really a non-issue, shouldn't have been rejected. Don't bother appealing, I already added it.

[Flying.Fonz]

Wow! That’s great and thanks very much. Nice surprise.

ATB

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I haven't worked on this image, but I wondered if it would be rejected for part of the aircraft being cut off. Unfortunately, I couldn't take a wider shot.



Thanks

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hi,

I haven't worked on this image, but I wondered if it would be rejected for part of the aircraft being cut off. Unfortunately, I couldn't take a wider shot.



Thanks

Hello,
yes the cut-off stab is an issue. Also photo is really unbalnced with such framing/angle

Regards
Alex

[Flying.Fonz]

Thought so.

Thanks

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I wanted to compare this rejection:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10882569

with this image:

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10890896

to understand the rejection as I based the image on several similar images in the database.

Many thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I wanted to compare this rejection:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10882569

with this image:

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10890896

to understand the rejection as I based the image on several similar images in the database.

Many thanks

Personal taste, mostly. Crop is a bit awkward at the top, but otherwise yes very similar to the accepted image.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks for your thoughts.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

The image below seems to have halos around the trees/houses/sky on the right-hand side. I compared it with the original, and those are still there, albeit a little less enhanced. Is that sufficient for a rejection?



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

The image below seems to have halos around the trees/houses/sky on the right-hand side. I compared it with the original, and those are still there, albeit a little less enhanced. Is that sufficient for a rejection?

Don't see any relevant halos.

[Flying.Fonz]

Ok. Thanks.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Is this classed as backlit?



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Is this classed as backlit?

Technically looks like yes, but works for this composition, imho. Only issue I could see is the space, but again works for me.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks for the thoughts.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

This image was rejected as Dark/Underexposed

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10910971

The exposure is slightly higher than that of the other images accepted in the same set taken at around the same time in the evening. Increasing exposure made the image look unnatural so I’d like to understand how badly underexposed it is, if at all.

Thanks