Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Is this likely to be rejected for not being centred?
    Probably.. I mean, I can see the intention, but the jet wash just isn't visible/striking enough to justify it for here I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Is this likely to be rejected for not being centred?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 788 G-ZBJG LHR 27L takeoff hotels 11-10-20.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	1131139

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks Pamela. Much appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Would this get rejected for backlit or too much/little contrast?


    Thanks
    For me the contrast is acceptable, though it is a tad dark. But I think it is too soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Would this get rejected for backlit or too much/little contrast?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Swiss A321N HP-JPA LHR sunrise land 27L 21-20-21.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	700.2 KB
ID:	1125983

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Understandable. Would the chocks be a problem too?
    Shouldn't be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Understandable. Would the chocks be a problem too?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm working on this image and wondered if it can be published here (blurred activity and obstructions)?
    Debatable since the obstruction is part of the scene. Would be ok for me, but can't say the same for others.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm working on this image and wondered if it can be published here (blurred activity and obstructions)?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	AF Sample image.jpg
Views:	169
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	1125321

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by Lehondre Photos View Post

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9025801

    Change 'viewqueued' to 'viewreject' in the link
    Aha, excellent.Thanks very much.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lehondre Photos
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    This was rejected for 'Bad Info' but I can't see what the info is so I don't know what was wrong. Do you know what the issue was?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9025801

    Thanks
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9025801

    Change 'viewqueued' to 'viewreject' in the link

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    This was rejected for 'Bad Info' but I can't see what the info is so I don't know what was wrong. Do you know what the issue was?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9025801

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Cool, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post

    We'll leave it at that then.

    Thanks. In general, how would you distinguish between light haloing and natural cloud effects? The majority of the time, it is obvious but in this instance, I had a look at the original image and there are unfortunately natural brighter sky areas around parts of the aircraft.

    Cheers
    Generally if it follows the the outline/shape of the aircraft itself its either a result of editing, or an extremely rare/unlucky cloud formation. If the latter, using a different frame taken only a few seconds earlier/later should solve the issue.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X