Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Ah, sorry. I believed your suggestion would be acceptable hence why I enquired. It might have been useful to raise it here, and then I would have acted upon it immediately. Unfortunately, those of us who mean well and intend to bring value to the site are the ones who take this seriously and are most disappointed when the punishment comes through. Thanks for pointing it out in any case.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks. Do you have any other thoughts?
    I do now, seeing as the one you decided to submit to the queue had the offending vegetation cloned out. This is obviously not allowed. I've rejected the image, and placed a warning on your account. Please be aware that any future instance of images submitted with such manipulation will result in a loss of upload slots and/or a ban.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Possible/probable issues with contrast, processing, and centering.
    Hi,

    I worked on your comments and wanted to see what you think of this one.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP UA 789 N29975 LHR 27L sunrise approach 20-02-21.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	833.9 KB
ID:	1113369

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    No worries. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post

    Comments about the Thomas Cook image.
    Seeing as how it is already in the queue, I do not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    About..?
    Comments about the Thomas Cook image.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks. Do you have any other thoughts?
    About..?

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks. Do you have any other thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Would that be sufficient for a rejection?
    Most likely yes, since this not a rare aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Would that be sufficient for a rejection?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm working on this old image. What are your thoughts?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Thomas Cook A332 G-TCXB HAV parked 21-11-17.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	701.8 KB
ID:	1113151

    Thanks
    Looks like a tiny bit of obstruction on the mlg from the vegetation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm working on this old image. What are your thoughts?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Thomas Cook A332 G-TCXB HAV parked 21-11-17.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	701.8 KB
ID:	1113151

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Irrespective of outcome, your opinions are of great help. Thanks very much.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks for your thoughts. What about these?

    Click image for larger version Name:	image_39390.jpg Views:	3 Size:	308.5 KB ID:	1112745 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_39391.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	326.1 KB
ID:	1112746

    Cheers
    Would be ok for me, but as always, that's just my opinion

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks for your thoughts. What about these?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	image_39390.jpg Views:	3 Size:	308.5 KB ID:	1112745 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_39391.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	326.1 KB
ID:	1112746

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X