Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks Geri.

I'm very intrigued about number 2 as I pondered about how to get the best out of it and wasn't sure how to avoid contrast issues. I took it about half an hour before number 1 and it was made interesting by the monster of a dark rain cloud behind it.

Thanks for the thoughts.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'm looking for advice on this set:






This next one is an older jpeg for a new reg on the database. I loaded it as such, ticking small prop and it was rejected for Categories wrong or missing and Bad info. Any ideas of which other categories need to be ticked? It was taken at Old Hay, UK and as the airfiled does not have an ICAO code I ticked unknown and UK for the country.



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm looking for advice on this set:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21616[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21617[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21618[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21619[/ATTACH]

This next one is an older jpeg for a new reg on the database. I loaded it as such, ticking small prop and it was rejected for Categories wrong or missing and Bad info. Any ideas of which other categories need to be ticked? It was taken at Old Hay, UK and as the airfiled does not have an ICAO code I ticked unknown and UK for the country.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21620[/ATTACH]

Thanks

1. borderline color/compression in sky
2. contrast
3. very borderline contrast
4. soft/blurry, contrast
5. small prop & warbird vintage (because of age) apply. 'Unknown' is not acceptable for location if you know where the photo was taken.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks very much. Very helpful.

How do you enter the location if it doesn’t have an ICAO code so it can’t be added to the database?

[dlowwa]

Thanks very much. Very helpful.

How do you enter the location if it doesn’t have an ICAO code so it can’t be added to the database?

If not already in the DB under a different name, use 'Other Location - xyz'

[Flying.Fonz]

Ah, I can see where I went wrong. Thanks very much.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'd be grateful for thoughts on this shot.



Thanks

[Alex - Spot-This !]

It's too dark I'm afraid

Regards
Alex

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks Alex. I'll work on that.

Cheers

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I've made some adjustments to the original one. Is this any better?



Also, this one was rejected for being too dark and too much/little contrast. I've worked on it and wanted to see if this is good enough.



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I've made some adjustments to the original one. Is this any better?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21687[/ATTACH]

Also, this one was rejected for being too dark and too much/little contrast. I've worked on it and wanted to see if this is good enough.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21688[/ATTACH]

Thanks

1. borderline, but would be acceptable for me
2. still borderline at best

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks for the feedback.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'm trying out a different type of photo so wanted to check the following please.



Its the first time I've posted a photo with two aircraft so wondering which registration to use or if any specific selections are required.

Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm trying out a different type of photo so wanted to check the following please.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22025[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22027[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22028[/ATTACH]

Its the first time I've posted a photo with two aircraft so wondering which registration to use or if any specific selections are required.

Cheers

1. blurry
2. soft, dark
3. soft

Use info for nearest aircraft if you have better quality images.

[Flying.Fonz]

Much appreciated.

Thanks