Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    I'm intersted to know what you mean exactly by overprocessing? Very little has been done to it so it'll be useful to understand it.

    Thanks
    Areas of the sky directly around the aircraft are brighter than the rest of the sky. Could just be (un)fortunate placement in that it's actually a natural effect, but that's typically what it will look like when a little too much s/h, clarity, etc.. Even looking at it again, I'm not 100% sure which is the case here, so I'd give you the benefit of the doubt, but when prescreening I try to list all of the potential issues just to be safe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    I'm intersted to know what you mean exactly by overprocessing? Very little has been done to it so it'll be useful to understand it.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks.

    How about this one?
    Again issues with (over)processing and centering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks.

    How about this one?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Delta 764 N836MH LHR 27L sunrise approach 20-02-21.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	579.3 KB
ID:	1110110

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Could I have your thogughts on this one please.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	JP UA 789 N29975 LHR 27L sunrise approach 20-02-21.jpg Views:	0 Size:	861.5 KB ID:	1110021

    Thanks
    Possible/probable issues with contrast, processing, and centering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Could I have your thogughts on this one please.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP UA 789 N29975 LHR 27L sunrise approach 20-02-21.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	861.5 KB
ID:	1110021

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thankyou

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Could I have a check on this one pease.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA A321N G-NEOZ LHR 09L sunset land 18-09-20.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	694.3 KB
ID:	1109409

    Thanks
    Might be a touch dark/soft for some, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Could I have a check on this one pease.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA A321N G-NEOZ LHR 09L sunset land 18-09-20.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	694.3 KB
ID:	1109409

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I had this image rejected for contrast (I think) some time ago and I'm working on it again. I've noticed quit a few contrast rejections on cloudy days recently so wanted to check if this is acceptable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 772 G-YMMT LHR 09R wet takeoff 05-03-2020.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	534.3 KB
ID:	1108901

    Thanks
    Very likely to be rejected for contrast/color/oversharpened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I had this image rejected for contrast (I think) some time ago and I'm working on it again. I've noticed quit a few contrast rejections on cloudy days recently so wanted to check if this is acceptable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 772 G-YMMT LHR 09R wet takeoff 05-03-2020.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	534.3 KB
ID:	1108901

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm looking for some firther guidance on 'Part of aircraft cutoff' after this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8853888

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP VS A351 G-VRNB LHR 27L line up 22-01-21.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1108784

    Prior to uploading it I reviewed the guidelines, other posts and plenty of uploaded images. I saw this image

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10018455

    which I really liked so I replicated it.

    I can understand the subjectiveness of too much/little contrast but I can't see a clear and obvious difference between the images as both demonstrate a motive. I'm interested to know what it is.

    Thanks
    Subjective, yes, but at least there was motive for awkward crop on the image you refer to - the special scheme. Your image is too wide to be considered a close up, and if the FI had been a regular aircraft, I would argue it should have been rejected as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm looking for some firther guidance on 'Part of aircraft cutoff' after this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8853888

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP VS A351 G-VRNB LHR 27L line up 22-01-21.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1108784

    Prior to uploading it I reviewed the guidelines, other posts and plenty of uploaded images. I saw this image

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10018455

    which I really liked so I replicated it.

    I can understand the subjectiveness of too much/little contrast but I can't see a clear and obvious difference between the images as both demonstrate a motive. I'm interested to know what it is.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X