Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Could I have a quick check on this one please.



Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Could I have a quick check on this one please.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22307[/ATTACH]

Cheers

Borderline for contrast.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks. Could I check that it is too much contrast please.

I had this one rejected for too little/much contrast and having sought advice, read up on it and corrected it, I was unsure and believed it was for too much contrast. Pointers for both would be greatly appreciated, make a significant difference to my development and hopefully less hassle for screeners.



Many thanks

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Virgin, just like Aeroflot or Jet2 are airlines with metallic paint scheme. Those scheme are extremely dull when there's no good sunlight on them which is the case here. Honestly I'm not sure you can make it better than what you already did.
Would it be my picture, I would keep it for the personal collection

kind Regards
Alex

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks Alex. That is just the type of info I was looking for.

Cheers
Andy

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi and thanks for previous feedback which has been extremely useful. With that in mind I've made some adjustments to how I do things and I'd like a check on these two.





Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi and thanks for previous feedback which has been extremely useful. With that in mind I've made some adjustments to how I do things and I'd like a check on these two.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22365[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22366[/ATTACH]

Cheers

1. borderline color/contrast
2. contrast, borderline soft

Both lack contrast due to overcast conditions.

[Flying.Fonz]

Fab. Thanks.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'm looking for advice (not just from screeners but other members too) on a couple of photos that were recently rejected. I can see they're not quite right (not looking to repost them) but I want to understand what can be done to improve photos (aside from taking better ones) when we then observe approved photos that are not to quite the standard usually seen on JP.

(I'm aware its not quite horizontal but easily fixed)




I'd be interested in your thoughts on these two to upload. I worked on the advice given (frankly, my first attempt was shockingly bad). It may well be that a lower resolution may help.





As always, grateful for your advice.


Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm looking for advice (not just from screeners but other members too) on a couple of photos that were recently rejected. I can see they're not quite right (not looking to repost them) but I want to understand what can be done to improve photos (aside from taking better ones) when we then observe approved photos that are not to quite the standard usually seen on JP.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22473[/ATTACH] (I'm aware its not quite horizontal but easily fixed)


[ATTACH=CONFIG]22474[/ATTACH]

I'd be interested in your thoughts on these two to upload. I worked on the advice given (frankly, my first attempt was shockingly bad). It may well be that a lower resolution may help.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22475[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22476[/ATTACH]

As always, grateful for your advice.


Cheers

1. contrast a bit flat, and needs a touch of brightening, but otherwise should be ok
2. sky in top of frame above stabilizer significantly darker than the rest. filter used?
3-4 slight green cast/flat light. not sure if fixable

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks for the thoughts.

I haven't got a filter. I remember distinctly that the sky was different at that moment but no problem looking at it again.

Cheers

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'm looking for a quick check on these please.

Can this one still be uploaded as a hot photo even though its been around for a couple of weeks?







Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm looking for a quick check on these please.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22590[/ATTACH] Can this one still be uploaded as a hot photo even though its been around for a couple of weeks?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22591[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22592[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22593[/ATTACH]

Cheers

1. not hot
2-3 borderline soft
4. soft, contrast

[Flying.Fonz]

Is 1. ok or does it need further work?

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Is 1. ok or does it need further work?

Thanks

Maybe a touch soft, but otherwise ok.