Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm looking for some firther guidance on 'Part of aircraft cutoff' after this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8853888

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP VS A351 G-VRNB LHR 27L line up 22-01-21.jpg
Views:	152
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1108784

    Prior to uploading it I reviewed the guidelines, other posts and plenty of uploaded images. I saw this image

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10018455

    which I really liked so I replicated it.

    I can understand the subjectiveness of too much/little contrast but I can't see a clear and obvious difference between the images as both demonstrate a motive. I'm interested to know what it is.

    Thanks
    Subjective, yes, but at least there was motive for awkward crop on the image you refer to - the special scheme. Your image is too wide to be considered a close up, and if the FI had been a regular aircraft, I would argue it should have been rejected as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm looking for some firther guidance on 'Part of aircraft cutoff' after this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8853888

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP VS A351 G-VRNB LHR 27L line up 22-01-21.jpg
Views:	152
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1108784

    Prior to uploading it I reviewed the guidelines, other posts and plenty of uploaded images. I saw this image

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10018455

    which I really liked so I replicated it.

    I can understand the subjectiveness of too much/little contrast but I can't see a clear and obvious difference between the images as both demonstrate a motive. I'm interested to know what it is.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    No worries at all and thanks for your insight.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks very much. Would this noise reduction be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version Name:	JP COPA 737 HP-1844CMP SJO 07 sunset takeoff 24-02-20.jpg Views:	0 Size:	379.4 KB ID:	1108734
    I like it. Can't promise it would escape a dark/contrast rejection, but like I said, would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks very much. Would this noise reduction be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	JP COPA 737 HP-1844CMP SJO 07 sunset takeoff 24-02-20.jpg Views:	0 Size:	379.4 KB ID:	1108734

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Could I have your thoughts on these two please.

    Click image for larger version Name:	JP COPA 737 HP-1844CMP SJO 07 sunset takeoff 24-02-20.jpg Views:	0 Size:	475.9 KB ID:	1108642

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP FX 752F N971FD SJO land 25 sunset 24-02-20.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	319.7 KB
ID:	1108650


    Thanks
    1. bit noisy, but the lighting works for me
    2. likely a dark/contrast rejection

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Could I have your thoughts on these two please.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	JP COPA 737 HP-1844CMP SJO 07 sunset takeoff 24-02-20.jpg Views:	0 Size:	475.9 KB ID:	1108642

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP FX 752F N971FD SJO land 25 sunset 24-02-20.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	319.7 KB
ID:	1108650


    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm working on this image taken whilst it was raining. The rain is not obvious unless looked into detail giving some halos. I've seen other uploaded images with plenty of halos but I wanted to see whether these were acceptable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 772 G-ZZZA LHR hangars stored night 19-03-20.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1108352

    Thanks
    There are some halos around the tail and especially wing root, but I don't think they should be too big of an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm working on this image taken whilst it was raining. The rain is not obvious unless looked into detail giving some halos. I've seen other uploaded images with plenty of halos but I wanted to see whether these were acceptable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 772 G-ZZZA LHR hangars stored night 19-03-20.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1108352

    Thanks
    I'm not screener but it is totally acceptable for me, there are no major halos.

    Regards!
    Pablo Gonzalez de Leon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm working on this image taken whilst it was raining. The rain is not obvious unless looked into detail giving some halos. I've seen other uploaded images with plenty of halos but I wanted to see whether these were acceptable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA 772 G-ZZZA LHR hangars stored night 19-03-20.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1108352

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I'm trying two new things and would like to get your thoughts please.
    1. soft, centering. Perhaps if there were something interesting lower in the frame you were trying to include it may be acceptable, but as it is, it's just a cut-off fence.
    2. soft

    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    For the last one, which registration would you suggest using?
    Visible wing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I'm trying two new things and would like to get your thoughts please.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP VS A351 G-VLUX LHR 27L land 22-01-21.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	1,019.2 KB
ID:	1107718


    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP EZY A319 LGW taxi TUI 788 09-08-20.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1107720

    For the last one, which registration would you suggest using?

    Many thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X