Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Thanks.

    Comment


    • #77
      Hi,

      Can you identify any issues with these two?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-Landor-744-web-copy.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.67 MB
ID:	1033621

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Ae-A333-land-web-copy.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.45 MB
ID:	1033622

      Cheers

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
        Hi,

        Can you identify any issues with these two?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]22611[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]22612[/ATTACH]

        Cheers
        Second probably needs a bit of CW rotation, but otherwise they should be ok.

        Comment


        • #79
          Thanks.

          When is the cutoff for a hot photo? I think its a week since the top one came out so suspect it no longer is but just wanted to check for future reference.

          Cheers

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
            Thanks.

            When is the cutoff for a hot photo? I think its a week since the top one came out so suspect it no longer is but just wanted to check for future reference.

            Cheers
            Depends on the situation. 48 hours for some, only first image for others.

            Both of the most recent BA special schemes are long past their hot windows.

            Comment


            • #81
              That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

              I was trying to figure out when a cropped photo of the fuselage, say the front, is categorised as 'Part of aircraft cutoff'. I looked through the forums but I couldn't find the info. Do you have any general pointers?

              Cheers

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

                I was trying to figure out when a cropped photo of the fuselage, say the front, is categorised as 'Part of aircraft cutoff'. I looked through the forums but I couldn't find the info. Do you have any general pointers?

                Cheers
                In the upload guideline, chapter 3.2 you will find this:
                3.2 Cut Off


                In many cases cropping out parts of the aircraft improves the photo.


                If something has been cut off without a clear motive for doing so it will most likely be rejected. Generally speaking, do not crop through essential parts of the main subject. As a rule of thumb if you want to show a close up of an aircraft, show only the main subject. For example: a photo showing almost the whole aircraft, but with the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected. A photo with a part of the aircraft, such as an engine cut off will also lead to a rejection in the majority of cases.


                Examples of not acceptable photos


                https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/005-Cropping-x.jpg
                Source: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version
                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                Comment


                • #83
                  Thanks for the advice Geri.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Hi,

                    Any thoughts on this one?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-744-Negus-parked-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1034000

                    Cheers

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                      Hi,

                      Any thoughts on this one?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]23064[/ATTACH]

                      Cheers
                      Likely a rejection for soft and contrast.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Thanks.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Hi,

                          I'm experimenting with a few things so wanted to check this photo. I'm also aware of the heat haze but having seen a number of similar photos on JP I wanted to check this.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	BA-744-Negus-Windsor-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.47 MB
ID:	1034046

                          Thanks

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                            Hi,

                            I'm experimenting with a few things so wanted to check this photo. I'm also aware of the heat haze but having seen a number of similar photos on JP I wanted to check this.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]23118[/ATTACH]

                            Thanks
                            Yes, heat haze/jetwash is noticeable on the aircraft. Would also be rejected for centering/too far.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Hi,

                              Thoughts on this one please.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	AG-heli-web.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1034323

                              Thanks

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
                                Hi,

                                Thoughts on this one please.

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]23521[/ATTACH]

                                Thanks
                                Maybe a touch soft, and I'd be careful some of the highlights don't get blown out, but otherwise should be ok.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X