Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Can you identify any issues with these two?





Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Can you identify any issues with these two?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22611[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22612[/ATTACH]

Cheers

Second probably needs a bit of CW rotation, but otherwise they should be ok.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks.

When is the cutoff for a hot photo? I think its a week since the top one came out so suspect it no longer is but just wanted to check for future reference.

Cheers

[dlowwa]

Thanks.

When is the cutoff for a hot photo? I think its a week since the top one came out so suspect it no longer is but just wanted to check for future reference.

Cheers

Depends on the situation. 48 hours for some, only first image for others.

Both of the most recent BA special schemes are long past their hot windows.

[Flying.Fonz]

That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

I was trying to figure out when a cropped photo of the fuselage, say the front, is categorised as 'Part of aircraft cutoff'. I looked through the forums but I couldn't find the info. Do you have any general pointers?

Cheers

[LX-A343]

That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

I was trying to figure out when a cropped photo of the fuselage, say the front, is categorised as 'Part of aircraft cutoff'. I looked through the forums but I couldn't find the info. Do you have any general pointers?

Cheers

In the upload guideline, chapter 3.2 you will find this:

3.2 Cut Off


In many cases cropping out parts of the aircraft improves the photo.


If something has been cut off without a clear motive for doing so it will most likely be rejected. Generally speaking, do not crop through essential parts of the main subject. As a rule of thumb if you want to show a close up of an aircraft, show only the main subject. For example: a photo showing almost the whole aircraft, but with the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected. A photo with a part of the aircraft, such as an engine cut off will also lead to a rejection in the majority of cases.


Examples of not acceptable photos

https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/003-Cut-off.jpg

https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/004-cutoff-y.jpg

https://cdn.jetphotos.com/custom/005-Cropping-x.jpg

Source: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks for the advice Geri.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Any thoughts on this one?



Cheers

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Any thoughts on this one?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]23064[/ATTACH]

Cheers

Likely a rejection for soft and contrast.

[Flying.Fonz]

Thanks.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

I'm experimenting with a few things so wanted to check this photo. I'm also aware of the heat haze but having seen a number of similar photos on JP I wanted to check this.



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

I'm experimenting with a few things so wanted to check this photo. I'm also aware of the heat haze but having seen a number of similar photos on JP I wanted to check this.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]23118[/ATTACH]

Thanks

Yes, heat haze/jetwash is noticeable on the aircraft. Would also be rejected for centering/too far.

[Flying.Fonz]

Hi,

Thoughts on this one please.



Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Thoughts on this one please.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]23521[/ATTACH]

Thanks

Maybe a touch soft, and I'd be careful some of the highlights don't get blown out, but otherwise should be ok.