Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Do I need to blur out the faces of the crew to comply with the upload guidelines?
    Moot point, blurring any faces will always be a manipulation rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tyler Godfrey
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Do I need to blur out the faces of the crew to comply with the upload guidelines?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Loganair ERJ-145EP G-SAJC MAN 23L line up 02-12-23.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1186949

    Thanks
    Hi, I have seen many photos that look the same, should be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • flyetty
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Do I need to blur out the faces of the crew to comply with the upload guidelines?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Loganair ERJ-145EP G-SAJC MAN 23L line up 02-12-23.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1186949

    Thanks
    Crew should be fine if you’re worrying about motive it’s only for like cockpit shots etc

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Do I need to blur out the faces of the crew to comply with the upload guidelines?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Loganair ERJ-145EP G-SAJC MAN 23L line up 02-12-23.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1186949

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks very much. I've increased the contrast and uploaded it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks very much -makes sense! Is this better?
    Contrast still a bit weak, but don't see any processing issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks very much -makes sense! Is this better?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP SQ A388 9V-SKPLHR 27L land 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	636.3 KB
ID:	1186569

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    🤔 thanks. By s/h do you mean saturation and hue?
    Shadow/highlight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    🤔 thanks. By s/h do you mean saturation and hue?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    I’m trying to understand this rejection. I haven’t changed what I do which is generally minimal and considered the feedback above. Thoughts?
    Contrast is very washed out and slight halos visible. Too much s/h or other tool.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    I’m trying to understand this rejection. I haven’t changed what I do which is generally minimal and considered the feedback above. Thoughts?


    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks. I'll have a look at those issues. On that note, do you have any observations on these?
    1. overprocessed, borderline noisy
    2. soft, borderline overprocessed/noisy
    3. borderline contrast/compression/overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks. I'll have a look at those issues. On that note, do you have any observations on these?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP SQ A388 9V-SKPLHR 27L land 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	887.4 KB
ID:	1183624Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA A388 G-XLEF LHR 27L landing 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	856.3 KB
ID:	1183625Click image for larger version

Name:	JP EK A388 A6-EUD LHR 27L land 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	640.6 KB
ID:	1183623

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Will this image count as similar to this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8977555 and therefore be rejected?
    Six years in between? Might be ok, but processing/contrast doesn't look good.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X