Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks very much. I've increased the contrast and uploaded it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks very much -makes sense! Is this better?
    Contrast still a bit weak, but don't see any processing issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks very much -makes sense! Is this better?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP SQ A388 9V-SKPLHR 27L land 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	636.3 KB
ID:	1186569

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    🤔 thanks. By s/h do you mean saturation and hue?
    Shadow/highlight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    🤔 thanks. By s/h do you mean saturation and hue?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    I’m trying to understand this rejection. I haven’t changed what I do which is generally minimal and considered the feedback above. Thoughts?
    Contrast is very washed out and slight halos visible. Too much s/h or other tool.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    I’m trying to understand this rejection. I haven’t changed what I do which is generally minimal and considered the feedback above. Thoughts?


    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Thanks. I'll have a look at those issues. On that note, do you have any observations on these?
    1. overprocessed, borderline noisy
    2. soft, borderline overprocessed/noisy
    3. borderline contrast/compression/overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks. I'll have a look at those issues. On that note, do you have any observations on these?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP SQ A388 9V-SKPLHR 27L land 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	887.4 KB
ID:	1183624Click image for larger version

Name:	JP BA A388 G-XLEF LHR 27L landing 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	856.3 KB
ID:	1183625Click image for larger version

Name:	JP EK A388 A6-EUD LHR 27L land 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	640.6 KB
ID:	1183623

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Will this image count as similar to this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8977555 and therefore be rejected?
    Six years in between? Might be ok, but processing/contrast doesn't look good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Will this image count as similar to this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8977555 and therefore be rejected?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Etihad A388 A6-APJ LHR 27L approach 16-01-24.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	897.7 KB
ID:	1182701

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    👍 thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi, is this correctly centred? I've been working of ways to avoid cutting parts of the aircraft.
    A bit awkward. Either leave the whole wing in or crop closer to the stabilizers.

    Leave a comment:


  • TRTPUwU
    replied
    Mayby a tighter crop might be better, but lets leave it to a screener

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X