Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Looking to see if this is ok for centring
    Maybe a touch low, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_F
    replied
    I don't think framing is a problem.  
    I'm not a screener, so I don't know the details, but I think it's a great shot!​

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Looking to see if this is ok for centring

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP RAF Spitfire Mk IX and V G-RYIX G-IBSY EGBK A2A 27-10-23.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	911.6 KB
ID:	1172941

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Great. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi, would this work?
    Might have issues with contrast (low) and color (oversaturated).

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi, would this work?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP China Southern 789 B-209E LHR 27L sunrise approach 22-09-23.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	348.7 KB
ID:	1172110

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Ok, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Would this be classified as backlit instead of a sunrise/sunset silhouette?
    Maybe a bit dark, but can't say that it's backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Would this be classified as backlit instead of a sunrise/sunset silhouette?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP China Southern 789 B-209E LHR 27L sunrise approach 22-09-23.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	349.4 KB
ID:	1169816

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    For these,

    Is the engine heat haze unacceptable (not processed yet)?

    Does this one work with the lighting?
    I'd personally try at lower resolutions, but other than minor quality flaws they would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    For these,

    Is the engine heat haze unacceptable (not processed yet)?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Sunrise test 1.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	622.3 KB
ID:	1169170

    Does this one work with the lighting?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP TUI 788 G-TUID LGW 08R lineup silhouette sunrise 05-09-23.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	894.3 KB
ID:	1169171

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    This one got rejected again for centring.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    In the original, the subject was too high. I lowered it, so I'm interested to see how far off-centre it now is (and the direction).

    As an aside, are there any plans to change the guidelines for resubmission regarding subjectivity; specifically a rejection reason not present in the original submission appearing in the resubmission despite no changes made to the image?
    Slightly hi, but centering is fine for me. Very slight halos, but also wouldn't have been an issue for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    This one got rejected again for centring.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    In the original, the subject was too high. I lowered it, so I'm interested to see how far off-centre it now is (and the direction).

    As an aside, are there any plans to change the guidelines for resubmission regarding subjectivity; specifically a rejection reason not present in the original submission appearing in the resubmission despite no changes made to the image?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X