Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit soft (not really blurry) towards the edges of the frame (winglets both sides basically). Should be able to hide that at a lower resolution.
    I resubmitted at a much lower resolution and it was rejected again for the same reason. Another reason was added despite no change to the image.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    As always, thanks for the suggestion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks, I'll ask the question there.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    I'm trying to work out who operated this aircraft (N168LM) in June 2022 to upload. Any suggestions? I can't find anything on the usual registry or the FAA websites.
    If not currently being operated, last displayed titles usually, but better to ask the editors as they will have final say.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    I'm trying to work out who operated this aircraft (N168LM) in June 2022 to upload. Any suggestions? I can't find anything on the usual registry or the FAA websites.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	JP Short 330-200 N168LM PANC parked 08-06-22.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.67 MB ID:	1167547

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Is the barbed wire around the nose gear classed as an obstruction?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cameron Roberts
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Is the barbed wire around the nose gear classed as an obstruction?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP TUI 738 D-ATUO CFU 34 taxi 27-09-22.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1167477

    Thanks
    Hi, I’m not a screener, but I would count that as obstruction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Is the barbed wire around the nose gear classed as an obstruction?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP TUI 738 D-ATUO CFU 34 taxi 27-09-22.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1167477

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Perfect. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Since Frontier doesn't have a standard colour scheme, do we select Special Scheme or not?
    Never selected special scheme for Frontier, except for the P&W green scheme's on the A321Neos.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Since Frontier doesn't have a standard colour scheme, do we select Special Scheme or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Great. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Great, thanks.

    Would something like this work?

    Thanks
    Blurry, somewhat dark, and the horizon looks a bit off. Latter two probably fixable, the former probably not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Great, thanks.

    Would something like this work?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Azerbaijan 788 VP-BBS LHR 27R sunset approach 29-07-23.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	331.3 KB
ID:	1167159

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I've recently seen several night images that have:

    - High ISO (>8000)
    - Low shutter speed (1/50)

    Generally, even if somehow you manage to get a stable enough image at that shutter speed, the ISO is such that you just can't get a sharp enough, low-noise, high-quality image. You can see they are a little blurred and noisy. I'm trying to understand what needs to be done to process these images so they are of sufficient quality to be accepted.

    Many thanks
    It is tricky, and I can tell you far more of such images get rejected than accepted. The best advice I can give it start with the largest file size possible so that you can shrink it down to hide most (if not all) of the flaws. Going from 7000+ pix to 1200 (or fewer) will do quite a lot to hide any quality issues.

    Other than that, finding the right balance of ISO vs. shutter speed it personal preference, though you at least have a chance to 'fix' a noisy image, while a blurry image can't really have anything done to improve it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X