Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Flying.Fonz - Editing advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View PostHi,
I've recently seen several night images that have:
- High ISO (>8000)
- Low shutter speed (1/50)
Generally, even if somehow you manage to get a stable enough image at that shutter speed, the ISO is such that you just can't get a sharp enough, low-noise, high-quality image. You can see they are a little blurred and noisy. I'm trying to understand what needs to be done to process these images so they are of sufficient quality to be accepted.
Many thanks
Other than that, finding the right balance of ISO vs. shutter speed it personal preference, though you at least have a chance to 'fix' a noisy image, while a blurry image can't really have anything done to improve it.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I've recently seen several night images that have:
- High ISO (>8000)
- Low shutter speed (1/50)
Generally, even if somehow you manage to get a stable enough image at that shutter speed, the ISO is such that you just can't get a sharp enough, low-noise, high-quality image. You can see they are a little blurred and noisy. I'm trying to understand what needs to be done to process these images so they are of sufficient quality to be accepted.
Many thanks
Leave a comment:
-
That's what I thought, but there was no difference when I compared it with the accepted ones. I'll use a lower res.
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View PostHi,
I was reviewing this rejection, and I couldn't really see the blurr/soft reason, especially when compared with the images from the same set that were accepted.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Thoughts? I was just going to re-upload it but 1600 or maybe 1280.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I was reviewing this rejection, and I couldn't really see the blurr/soft reason, especially when compared with the images from the same set that were accepted.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Thoughts? I was just going to re-upload it but 1600 or maybe 1280.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
It's bizarre as I checked the colourspace and reviewed many other images with the same settings -I never had it before. It seems to have removed the cyan that livens up the green.
As always, thanks for your thoughts.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View PostHi,
I worked on this image, and it looks flat when I uploaded it to the queue. It looks vibrant on my screen (calibrated), and the settings are the same as those for all my other images. I'm not sure why there's such a big difference I've never had before.
Is this image acceptable as it is?
Any idea what is causing it to look flat?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I worked on this image, and it looks flat when I uploaded it to the queue. It looks vibrant on my screen (calibrated), and the settings are the same as those for all my other images. I'm not sure why there's such a big difference I've never had before.
Is this image acceptable as it is?
Any idea what is causing it to look flat?
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View PostHi,
I was working on this previous rejection -I can't remember why, but I think it was too bright. I've corrected it, but I noticed that while the image looks fine, there is a lighter ring around the centre. If you can see it, is it a problem? Is there anything else that could cause problems?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I was working on this previous rejection -I can't remember why, but I think it was too bright. I've corrected it, but I noticed that while the image looks fine, there is a lighter ring around the centre. If you can see it, is it a problem? Is there anything else that could cause problems?
Thanks
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: